Dominican vs Immigrants from Somalia Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Dominican
Immigrants from Somalia
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Dominicans
Immigrants from Somalia
25.4%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
309th/ 347
METRIC RANK
25.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
316th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Dominican vs Immigrants from Somalia Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 349,852,578 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Dominicans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.407 and weighted average of 25.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,892,482 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Somalia and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.512 and weighted average of 25.8%, a difference of 1.4%.

Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Dominican | Immigrants from Somalia |
| Minimum | 10.3% | 8.3% |
| Maximum | 78.2% | 54.5% |
| Range | 67.9% | 46.2% |
| Mean | 29.2% | 27.4% |
| Median | 25.3% | 25.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 22.1% | 20.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 34.4% | 34.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.4% | 13.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.8% | 10.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.7% | 10.3% |
Demographics Similar to Dominicans and Immigrants from Somalia by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Dominicans are Aleut (25.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Central American Indian (25.5%, a difference of 0.15%), Potawatomi (25.4%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Mexico (25.3%, a difference of 0.41%), and Immigrants from Honduras (25.5%, a difference of 0.43%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Somalia are Iroquois (25.7%, a difference of 0.15%), Cherokee (25.7%, a difference of 0.47%), Comanche (25.6%, a difference of 0.83%), Ottawa (26.0%, a difference of 0.84%), and Paiute (25.5%, a difference of 0.94%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 25.1% |
| Somalis | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 25.2% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 25.3% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 25.3% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 25.3% |
| Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 25.4% |
| Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 25.4% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 25.4% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 25.5% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 25.5% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 25.5% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 25.6% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 25.7% |
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 25.7% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 25.8% |
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.0% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.6% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 26.8% |