Czech vs Eastern European Poverty
COMPARE
Czech
Eastern European
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Czechs
Eastern Europeans
10.8%
POVERTY
99.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
38th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.6%
POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
22nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Czech vs Eastern European Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 484,408,527 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Czechs and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.223 and weighted average of 10.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 460,932,283 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Eastern Europeans and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.505 and weighted average of 10.6%, a difference of 2.3%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Czech | Eastern European |
Minimum | 0.93% | 1.7% |
Maximum | 34.6% | 39.9% |
Range | 33.7% | 38.2% |
Mean | 9.5% | 11.2% |
Median | 9.5% | 7.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.6% | 5.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.9% | 13.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.3% | 8.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.8% | 9.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.7% | 9.1% |
Demographics Similar to Czechs and Eastern Europeans by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Czechs are Immigrants from Greece (10.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Pakistan (10.8%, a difference of 0.080%), Russian (10.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Cypriot (10.8%, a difference of 0.14%), and Tongan (10.8%, a difference of 0.22%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Eastern Europeans are Swedish (10.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Italian (10.6%, a difference of 0.15%), Luxembourger (10.6%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from North Macedonia (10.6%, a difference of 0.24%), and Croatian (10.6%, a difference of 0.35%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Luxembourgers | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Italians | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Croatians | 99.6 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Burmese | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.5 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Greeks | 99.5 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Danes | 99.5 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Poles | 99.5 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Iranians | 99.5 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Macedonians | 99.4 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Immigrants | Poland | 99.4 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Tongans | 99.4 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Cypriots | 99.3 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Immigrants | Greece | 99.3 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Czechs | 99.3 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.3 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Russians | 99.3 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 10.9% |