Czech vs Colombian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Czech
Colombian
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Czechs
Colombians
14.2%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
99.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
48th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.9%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
76.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
157th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Czech vs Colombian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 470,185,036 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Czechs and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.003 and weighted average of 14.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 411,792,249 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Colombians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.267 and weighted average of 15.9%, a difference of 12.5%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Czech | Colombian |
Minimum | 0.95% | 3.1% |
Maximum | 36.4% | 58.6% |
Range | 35.4% | 55.5% |
Mean | 14.7% | 15.7% |
Median | 13.5% | 14.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.1% | 12.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.5% | 17.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.4% | 4.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.8% | 7.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.8% | 7.3% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Czechs by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Czechs are Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (14.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Croatian (14.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Greek (14.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Greece (14.1%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Israel (14.2%, a difference of 0.11%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.5 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 14.0% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.4 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 14.0% |
Koreans | 99.4 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Immigrants | Asia | 99.4 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Immigrants | Greece | 99.3 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Croatians | 99.3 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.3 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Czechs | 99.3 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Greeks | 99.2 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Immigrants | Israel | 99.2 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.1 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Italians | 99.1 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Luxembourgers | 99.0 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Estonians | 98.9 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Immigrants | Romania | 98.9 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Demographics Similar to Colombians by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Colombians are Immigrants from Fiji (15.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Syrian (15.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Chile (15.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Guamanian/Chamorro (15.9%, a difference of 0.12%), and Slovak (15.9%, a difference of 0.13%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Albania | 80.7 /100 | #150 | Excellent 15.8% |
Venezuelans | 80.1 /100 | #151 | Excellent 15.8% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 79.4 /100 | #152 | Good 15.8% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 78.5 /100 | #153 | Good 15.9% |
Immigrants | Chile | 76.7 /100 | #154 | Good 15.9% |
Syrians | 76.7 /100 | #155 | Good 15.9% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 76.1 /100 | #156 | Good 15.9% |
Colombians | 76.1 /100 | #157 | Good 15.9% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 75.3 /100 | #158 | Good 15.9% |
Slovaks | 75.2 /100 | #159 | Good 15.9% |
French | 72.8 /100 | #160 | Good 16.0% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 72.0 /100 | #161 | Good 16.0% |
French Canadians | 68.7 /100 | #162 | Good 16.1% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 68.4 /100 | #163 | Good 16.1% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 67.8 /100 | #164 | Good 16.1% |