Czechoslovakian vs Taiwanese Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Czechoslovakian
Taiwanese
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Czechoslovakians
Taiwanese
21.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
27.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
194th/ 347
METRIC RANK
19.4%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
83rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Czechoslovakian vs Taiwanese Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 361,916,280 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.330 and weighted average of 21.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 31,618,810 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Taiwanese and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.420 and weighted average of 19.4%, a difference of 9.8%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Czechoslovakian | Taiwanese |
| Minimum | 7.4% | 6.5% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 45.7% |
| Range | 92.6% | 39.3% |
| Mean | 33.3% | 19.6% |
| Median | 25.9% | 18.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 21.1% | 13.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 39.9% | 24.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 18.8% | 11.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 21.6% | 8.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 21.3% | 8.6% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Czechoslovakians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Nicaraguan (21.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Basque (21.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (21.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Japanese (21.3%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from Jamaica (21.3%, a difference of 0.21%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 36.8 /100 | #187 | Fair 21.2% |
| Yugoslavians | 35.4 /100 | #188 | Fair 21.2% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 35.3 /100 | #189 | Fair 21.2% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 35.2 /100 | #190 | Fair 21.2% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 31.1 /100 | #191 | Fair 21.3% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 30.5 /100 | #192 | Fair 21.3% |
| Basques | 28.1 /100 | #193 | Fair 21.3% |
| Czechoslovakians | 27.7 /100 | #194 | Fair 21.3% |
| Nicaraguans | 27.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 21.3% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 27.1 /100 | #196 | Fair 21.3% |
| Japanese | 26.4 /100 | #197 | Fair 21.3% |
| Swiss | 24.2 /100 | #198 | Fair 21.4% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 22.0 /100 | #199 | Fair 21.4% |
| Irish | 21.4 /100 | #200 | Fair 21.4% |
| Nigerians | 20.9 /100 | #201 | Fair 21.4% |
Demographics Similar to Taiwanese by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Taiwanese are Immigrants from Malaysia (19.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Scotland (19.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Australia (19.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Sierra Leone (19.4%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Sweden (19.4%, a difference of 0.080%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Peruvians | 99.4 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 99.3 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Albanians | 99.3 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 99.3 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 99.3 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.2 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 99.2 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Taiwanese | 99.2 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 99.2 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Greeks | 99.2 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Zimbabweans | 99.0 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 19.5% |
| Afghans | 99.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 19.5% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 99.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 19.5% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 98.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 19.6% |