Cypriot vs Tongan Female Poverty
COMPARE
Cypriot
Tongan
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Cypriots
Tongans
11.8%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
33rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
44th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cypriot vs Tongan Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,838,205 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Cypriots and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.377 and weighted average of 11.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 102,866,719 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Tongans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.143 and weighted average of 11.9%, a difference of 1.1%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Cypriot | Tongan |
| Minimum | 1.5% | 5.1% |
| Maximum | 28.6% | 22.7% |
| Range | 27.1% | 17.6% |
| Mean | 9.4% | 11.8% |
| Median | 8.5% | 11.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.7% | 9.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.6% | 13.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.9% | 3.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.5% | 3.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.4% | 3.6% |
Demographics Similar to Cypriots and Tongans by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Cypriots are Danish (11.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Singapore (11.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Polish (11.7%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Iran (11.8%, a difference of 0.29%), and Greek (11.7%, a difference of 0.42%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Tongans are Korean (11.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (11.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Turkish (11.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Czech (11.9%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Moldova (11.9%, a difference of 0.11%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Korea | 99.6 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.6 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Greeks | 99.5 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Poles | 99.5 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Danes | 99.5 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Cypriots | 99.5 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 99.4 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 99.4 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.4 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 99.3 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Russians | 99.3 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 99.3 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Macedonians | 99.3 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Czechs | 99.2 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 99.2 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Koreans | 99.2 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Tongans | 99.2 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.2 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Turks | 99.2 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Asians | 99.1 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.0 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 11.9% |