Croatian vs Iranian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Croatian
Iranian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Croatians
Iranians
11.6%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
26th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.7%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
27th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Croatian vs Iranian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 375,484,978 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Croatians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.218 and weighted average of 11.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 316,618,692 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Iranians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.047 and weighted average of 11.7%, a difference of 0.11%.
![Croatian vs Iranian Female Poverty](/correlation-charts/metric-comparison/female-poverty/croatians-vs-iranians-female-poverty-chart.webp)
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Croatian | Iranian |
Minimum | 0.92% | 3.6% |
Maximum | 35.7% | 31.0% |
Range | 34.8% | 27.5% |
Mean | 11.8% | 9.7% |
Median | 10.0% | 9.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.6% | 7.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.2% | 11.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.6% | 3.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.4% | 4.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.4% | 4.6% |
Demographics Similar to Croatians and Iranians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Croatians are Immigrants from Northern Europe (11.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Luxembourger (11.6%, a difference of 0.27%), Burmese (11.6%, a difference of 0.29%), Immigrants from Korea (11.7%, a difference of 0.32%), and Swedish (11.6%, a difference of 0.43%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Iranians are Immigrants from Northern Europe (11.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Korea (11.7%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from North Macedonia (11.7%, a difference of 0.36%), Luxembourger (11.6%, a difference of 0.38%), and Burmese (11.6%, a difference of 0.40%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Italians | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Luxembourgers | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Croatians | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Iranians | 99.6 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.6 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.6 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Greeks | 99.5 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Poles | 99.5 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Danes | 99.5 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Cypriots | 99.5 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 99.4 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Immigrants | Iran | 99.4 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.4 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 11.8% |