Chinese vs Navajo Family Poverty
COMPARE
Chinese
Navajo
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Chinese
Navajo
6.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
2nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
18.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
345th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chinese vs Navajo Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,784,795 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.039 and weighted average of 6.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,626,486 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Navajo and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.529 and weighted average of 18.8%, a difference of 189.1%.
![Chinese vs Navajo Family Poverty](/correlation-charts/metric-comparison/family-poverty/chinese-vs-navajo-family-poverty-chart.webp)
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chinese | Navajo |
Minimum | 1.3% | 3.8% |
Maximum | 19.1% | 64.6% |
Range | 17.8% | 60.8% |
Mean | 6.8% | 23.5% |
Median | 6.3% | 20.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.5% | 13.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.0% | 32.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.5% | 19.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.1% | 12.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.1% | 12.8% |
Similar Demographics by Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Taiwan (6.6%, a difference of 1.6%), Filipino (6.6%, a difference of 2.2%), Thai (6.7%, a difference of 2.8%), Immigrants from India (6.2%, a difference of 4.3%), and Norwegian (6.9%, a difference of 5.9%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 6.2% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 6.5% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 6.6% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 6.6% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 6.7% |
Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 6.9% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 7.0% |
Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 7.0% |
Latvians | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Bulgarians | 99.8 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 99.8 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Maltese | 99.8 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Swedes | 99.8 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Iranians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Demographics Similar to Navajo by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Navajo are Yup'ik (18.7%, a difference of 0.55%), Pima (18.4%, a difference of 2.4%), Immigrants from Yemen (17.5%, a difference of 7.7%), Puerto Rican (20.3%, a difference of 8.1%), and Tohono O'odham (20.4%, a difference of 8.5%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 14.4% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 14.6% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 14.7% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 15.9% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 15.9% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 16.1% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 16.6% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 17.0% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 17.0% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 17.5% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 18.4% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 18.7% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 18.8% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 20.3% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 20.4% |