Cherokee vs Bangladeshi Male Poverty
COMPARE
Cherokee
Bangladeshi
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Cherokee
Bangladeshis
13.1%
MALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
259th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.6%
MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
277th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cherokee vs Bangladeshi Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 493,122,545 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.361 and weighted average of 13.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 141,334,691 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Bangladeshis and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.002 and weighted average of 13.6%, a difference of 4.1%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Cherokee | Bangladeshi |
| Minimum | 3.6% | 3.9% |
| Maximum | 54.2% | 28.8% |
| Range | 50.6% | 24.9% |
| Mean | 17.8% | 13.8% |
| Median | 16.3% | 12.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.4% | 10.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.6% | 17.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.2% | 6.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.8% | 5.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.8% | 5.5% |
Demographics Similar to Cherokee and Bangladeshis by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Cherokee are Ottawa (13.1%, a difference of 0.11%), Trinidadian and Tobagonian (13.1%, a difference of 0.13%), Cape Verdean (13.1%, a difference of 0.16%), Spanish American Indian (13.1%, a difference of 0.18%), and Central American (13.2%, a difference of 0.58%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bangladeshis are Belizean (13.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Latin America (13.6%, a difference of 0.15%), Barbadian (13.6%, a difference of 0.34%), Immigrants from West Indies (13.5%, a difference of 0.97%), and Chickasaw (13.5%, a difference of 1.0%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Ottawa | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Spanish American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Central Americans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Guyanese | 0.0 /100 | #269 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Cree | 0.0 /100 | #270 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 13.6% |