Central American Indian vs Zimbabwean Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds
COMPARE
Central American Indian
Zimbabwean
Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds
Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds Comparison
Central American Indians
Zimbabweans
22.6%
FEMALE POVERTY AMONG 18-24 YEAR OLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
298th/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.4%
FEMALE POVERTY AMONG 18-24 YEAR OLDS
21.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
197th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Central American Indian vs Zimbabwean Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 322,009,816 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Central American Indians and poverty level among females between the ages 18 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.435 and weighted average of 22.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 68,868,173 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and poverty level among females between the ages 18 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.037 and weighted average of 20.4%, a difference of 10.6%.
Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds Correlation Summary
Measurement | Central American Indian | Zimbabwean |
Minimum | 8.8% | 0.87% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 43.9% |
Range | 91.2% | 43.0% |
Mean | 33.2% | 17.3% |
Median | 26.0% | 18.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 20.6% | 7.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 42.6% | 23.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 22.0% | 15.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 20.4% | 10.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 20.3% | 10.3% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds
Demographics Similar to Central American Indians by Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds
In terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds, the demographic groups most similar to Central American Indians are Inupiat (22.6%, a difference of 0.070%), Menominee (22.5%, a difference of 0.21%), Shoshone (22.5%, a difference of 0.32%), Cherokee (22.7%, a difference of 0.41%), and Indonesian (22.5%, a difference of 0.44%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds |
Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 22.5% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 22.5% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 22.5% |
Indonesians | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 22.5% |
Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 22.5% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 22.5% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 22.6% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 22.6% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 22.7% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 22.8% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 22.9% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 22.9% |
Senegalese | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 23.0% |
Sudanese | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 23.0% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 23.0% |
Demographics Similar to Zimbabweans by Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds
In terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Immigrants from Spain (20.4%, a difference of 0.020%), German (20.4%, a difference of 0.030%), European (20.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Czech (20.4%, a difference of 0.090%), and Immigrants from Latvia (20.4%, a difference of 0.14%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 29.3 /100 | #190 | Fair 20.3% |
Moroccans | 25.8 /100 | #191 | Fair 20.4% |
Immigrants | Israel | 24.4 /100 | #192 | Fair 20.4% |
Nigerians | 23.4 /100 | #193 | Fair 20.4% |
Mexican American Indians | 23.2 /100 | #194 | Fair 20.4% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 23.0 /100 | #195 | Fair 20.4% |
Czechs | 22.3 /100 | #196 | Fair 20.4% |
Zimbabweans | 21.0 /100 | #197 | Fair 20.4% |
Immigrants | Spain | 20.7 /100 | #198 | Fair 20.4% |
Germans | 20.6 /100 | #199 | Fair 20.4% |
Europeans | 19.9 /100 | #200 | Poor 20.4% |
Mexicans | 18.3 /100 | #201 | Poor 20.5% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 17.7 /100 | #202 | Poor 20.5% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 17.2 /100 | #203 | Poor 20.5% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 17.0 /100 | #204 | Poor 20.5% |