Central American Indian vs British West Indian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Central American Indian
British West Indian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Central American Indians
British West Indians
18.0%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
326th/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.0%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
313th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Central American Indian vs British West Indian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 326,040,737 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Central American Indians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.595 and weighted average of 18.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 152,611,621 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of British West Indians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.142 and weighted average of 17.0%, a difference of 5.8%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Central American Indian | British West Indian |
Minimum | 1.4% | 1.8% |
Maximum | 94.5% | 34.4% |
Range | 93.2% | 32.6% |
Mean | 26.1% | 14.9% |
Median | 20.8% | 15.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.1% | 12.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 37.5% | 18.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 23.4% | 6.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 17.4% | 6.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 17.3% | 6.0% |
Demographics Similar to Central American Indians and British West Indians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Central American Indians are Yakama (18.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Colville (17.8%, a difference of 1.5%), Immigrants from Honduras (17.7%, a difference of 1.7%), Paiute (17.7%, a difference of 1.9%), and Menominee (17.6%, a difference of 2.5%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to British West Indians are Immigrants from Somalia (17.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Creek (17.0%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Guatemala (17.0%, a difference of 0.17%), Dutch West Indian (17.1%, a difference of 0.25%), and Immigrants from Mexico (17.0%, a difference of 0.41%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 17.0% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 17.0% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 17.0% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 17.0% |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 17.0% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 17.1% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 17.3% |
Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 17.4% |
Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 17.4% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 17.5% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 17.5% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 17.5% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 17.5% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 17.6% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 17.7% |
Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 17.7% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 17.8% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 18.0% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 18.0% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 18.6% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 18.6% |