Celtic vs Potawatomi Single Father Poverty
COMPARE
Celtic
Potawatomi
Single Father Poverty
Single Father Poverty Comparison
Celtics
Potawatomi
18.5%
SINGLE FATHER POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
303rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
18.9%
SINGLE FATHER POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
313th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Celtic vs Potawatomi Single Father Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 145,202,349 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and poverty level among single fathers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.641 and weighted average of 18.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,133,326 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Potawatomi and poverty level among single fathers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.496 and weighted average of 18.9%, a difference of 2.2%.
Single Father Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Celtic | Potawatomi |
| Minimum | 8.4% | 14.8% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 91.6% | 85.2% |
| Mean | 42.2% | 38.4% |
| Median | 26.0% | 27.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 19.0% | 21.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 50.8% | 50.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 31.8% | 28.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 32.4% | 25.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 32.1% | 25.4% |
Demographics Similar to Celtics and Potawatomi by Single Father Poverty
In terms of single father poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are Comanche (18.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Ute (18.5%, a difference of 0.14%), Hungarian (18.5%, a difference of 0.15%), Blackfeet (18.5%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from Dominican Republic (18.4%, a difference of 0.37%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Potawatomi are Delaware (18.9%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Dominica (18.9%, a difference of 0.20%), Nonimmigrants (18.8%, a difference of 0.25%), Chickasaw (19.0%, a difference of 0.32%), and Chippewa (18.8%, a difference of 0.44%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Father Poverty |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 18.3% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 18.4% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 18.4% |
| Hungarians | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 18.5% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 18.5% |
| Celtics | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 18.5% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 18.5% |
| Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 18.5% |
| Scotch-Irish | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 18.6% |
| French Canadians | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 18.8% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 18.8% |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 18.9% |
| Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 18.9% |
| Delaware | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 18.9% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 19.0% |
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 19.0% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 19.1% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 19.2% |