Celtic vs Nigerian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Celtic
Nigerian
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Celtics
Nigerians
17.0%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
25.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
196th/ 347
METRIC RANK
18.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
240th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Celtic vs Nigerian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 167,177,387 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.158 and weighted average of 17.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 329,051,833 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Nigerians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.028 and weighted average of 18.7%, a difference of 10.1%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Celtic | Nigerian |
Minimum | 3.3% | 3.1% |
Maximum | 70.9% | 55.2% |
Range | 67.6% | 52.1% |
Mean | 25.7% | 19.5% |
Median | 20.4% | 18.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.9% | 16.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 34.3% | 22.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 18.4% | 5.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.5% | 8.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.3% | 8.5% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Celtics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are Immigrants from Costa Rica (17.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Spaniard (17.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Lebanon (17.1%, a difference of 0.41%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (17.1%, a difference of 0.43%), and Spanish (16.9%, a difference of 0.48%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 32.5 /100 | #189 | Fair 16.8% |
Kenyans | 32.3 /100 | #190 | Fair 16.8% |
Immigrants | Azores | 31.3 /100 | #191 | Fair 16.8% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 31.3 /100 | #192 | Fair 16.8% |
Aleuts | 28.7 /100 | #193 | Fair 16.9% |
Spanish | 28.6 /100 | #194 | Fair 16.9% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 25.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 17.0% |
Celtics | 25.2 /100 | #196 | Fair 17.0% |
Spaniards | 24.9 /100 | #197 | Fair 17.0% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 22.6 /100 | #198 | Fair 17.1% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 22.4 /100 | #199 | Fair 17.1% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 21.5 /100 | #200 | Fair 17.1% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 17.8 /100 | #201 | Poor 17.2% |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 17.6 /100 | #202 | Poor 17.2% |
Ugandans | 17.5 /100 | #203 | Poor 17.2% |
Demographics Similar to Nigerians by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Nigerians are Marshallese (18.7%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Eritrea (18.7%, a difference of 0.21%), American (18.8%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from Nigeria (18.6%, a difference of 0.35%), and Immigrants from Cuba (18.8%, a difference of 0.47%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Sudanese | 1.1 /100 | #233 | Tragic 18.6% |
Fijians | 1.1 /100 | #234 | Tragic 18.6% |
Nepalese | 1.1 /100 | #235 | Tragic 18.6% |
Alsatians | 1.1 /100 | #236 | Tragic 18.6% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 1.0 /100 | #237 | Tragic 18.6% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 1.0 /100 | #238 | Tragic 18.7% |
Marshallese | 0.9 /100 | #239 | Tragic 18.7% |
Nigerians | 0.9 /100 | #240 | Tragic 18.7% |
Americans | 0.8 /100 | #241 | Tragic 18.8% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 0.7 /100 | #242 | Tragic 18.8% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.7 /100 | #243 | Tragic 18.8% |
Ecuadorians | 0.7 /100 | #244 | Tragic 18.8% |
Shoshone | 0.6 /100 | #245 | Tragic 18.9% |
Immigrants | Laos | 0.6 /100 | #246 | Tragic 18.9% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.5 /100 | #247 | Tragic 18.9% |