Burmese vs Puget Sound Salish Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
COMPARE
Burmese
Puget Sound Salish
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Comparison
Burmese
Puget Sound Salish
13.0%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
12th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.8%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
79.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
151st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Burmese vs Puget Sound Salish Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 454,977,536 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Burmese and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.297 and weighted average of 13.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,876,308 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Puget Sound Salish and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.222 and weighted average of 15.8%, a difference of 21.9%.
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Burmese | Puget Sound Salish |
Minimum | 1.2% | 6.4% |
Maximum | 41.5% | 35.8% |
Range | 40.3% | 29.3% |
Mean | 10.9% | 16.6% |
Median | 9.0% | 14.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.6% | 10.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.7% | 23.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.1% | 13.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.7% | 7.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.6% | 7.2% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Demographics Similar to Burmese by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Burmese are Immigrants from Korea (13.0%, a difference of 0.50%), Immigrants from Ireland (13.1%, a difference of 1.2%), Immigrants from Japan (13.1%, a difference of 1.3%), Maltese (13.2%, a difference of 1.6%), and Norwegian (13.2%, a difference of 1.7%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 12.6% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 13.0% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 13.0% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 13.1% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 13.1% |
Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 13.2% |
Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 13.2% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Bolivians | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Demographics Similar to Puget Sound Salish by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Puget Sound Salish are Immigrants from Venezuela (15.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Jordan (15.8%, a difference of 0.080%), Slovak (15.8%, a difference of 0.090%), French (15.8%, a difference of 0.19%), and Brazilian (15.8%, a difference of 0.23%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Immigrants | Peru | 83.5 /100 | #144 | Excellent 15.7% |
Samoans | 83.2 /100 | #145 | Excellent 15.7% |
New Zealanders | 82.4 /100 | #146 | Excellent 15.7% |
Venezuelans | 82.1 /100 | #147 | Excellent 15.7% |
Brazilians | 81.0 /100 | #148 | Excellent 15.8% |
Slovaks | 80.3 /100 | #149 | Excellent 15.8% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 80.2 /100 | #150 | Excellent 15.8% |
Puget Sound Salish | 79.8 /100 | #151 | Good 15.8% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 79.5 /100 | #152 | Good 15.8% |
French | 78.7 /100 | #153 | Good 15.8% |
Syrians | 77.5 /100 | #154 | Good 15.9% |
French Canadians | 76.6 /100 | #155 | Good 15.9% |
Israelis | 76.5 /100 | #156 | Good 15.9% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 76.0 /100 | #157 | Good 15.9% |
Yugoslavians | 75.9 /100 | #158 | Good 15.9% |