Bulgarian vs Immigrants from North Macedonia Poverty
COMPARE
Bulgarian
Immigrants from North Macedonia
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Bulgarians
Immigrants from North Macedonia
10.2%
POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
10th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.6%
POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
20th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bulgarian vs Immigrants from North Macedonia Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 205,564,290 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Bulgarians and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.790 and weighted average of 10.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 74,289,805 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from North Macedonia and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.392 and weighted average of 10.6%, a difference of 3.2%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Bulgarian | Immigrants from North Macedonia |
Minimum | 0.47% | 0.071% |
Maximum | 53.2% | 19.6% |
Range | 52.7% | 19.5% |
Mean | 8.2% | 8.6% |
Median | 7.8% | 8.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.2% | 5.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.5% | 10.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.3% | 4.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.4% | 4.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.3% | 3.9% |
Demographics Similar to Bulgarians and Immigrants from North Macedonia by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Bulgarians are Immigrants from South Central Asia (10.2%, a difference of 0.41%), Maltese (10.2%, a difference of 0.86%), Immigrants from Lithuania (10.3%, a difference of 0.99%), Filipino (10.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and Bhutanese (10.4%, a difference of 1.3%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from North Macedonia are Luxembourger (10.6%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Scotland (10.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Eastern European (10.6%, a difference of 0.24%), Swedish (10.6%, a difference of 0.34%), and Italian (10.6%, a difference of 0.39%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.8 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Luxembourgers | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Italians | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Croatians | 99.6 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 10.6% |