Brazilian vs Afghan Poverty
COMPARE
Brazilian
Afghan
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Brazilians
Afghans
11.9%
POVERTY
79.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
143rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.0%
POVERTY
74.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
146th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Brazilian vs Afghan Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 323,736,461 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Brazilians and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.123 and weighted average of 11.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 148,816,997 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Afghans and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.149 and weighted average of 12.0%, a difference of 0.69%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Brazilian | Afghan |
| Minimum | 2.1% | 0.81% |
| Maximum | 33.9% | 30.8% |
| Range | 31.8% | 30.0% |
| Mean | 11.7% | 12.1% |
| Median | 11.1% | 10.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.8% | 8.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.3% | 14.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.5% | 6.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.0% | 5.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.0% | 5.5% |
Demographics Similar to Brazilians and Afghans by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Brazilians are Basque (11.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from France (11.9%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Peru (11.9%, a difference of 0.22%), Icelander (11.9%, a difference of 0.27%), and Pakistani (11.9%, a difference of 0.41%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Afghans are Syrian (12.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (12.0%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Germany (12.0%, a difference of 0.28%), Immigrants from Malaysia (12.0%, a difference of 0.28%), and Immigrants from Kazakhstan (12.0%, a difference of 0.33%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Yugoslavians | 85.2 /100 | #134 | Excellent 11.8% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 85.2 /100 | #135 | Excellent 11.8% |
| Chileans | 84.2 /100 | #136 | Excellent 11.8% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 83.0 /100 | #137 | Excellent 11.8% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 82.4 /100 | #138 | Excellent 11.9% |
| Pakistanis | 82.2 /100 | #139 | Excellent 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 81.1 /100 | #140 | Excellent 11.9% |
| Immigrants | France | 80.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 11.9% |
| Basques | 80.4 /100 | #142 | Excellent 11.9% |
| Brazilians | 79.7 /100 | #143 | Good 11.9% |
| Icelanders | 77.9 /100 | #144 | Good 11.9% |
| Syrians | 75.1 /100 | #145 | Good 12.0% |
| Afghans | 74.9 /100 | #146 | Good 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 73.7 /100 | #147 | Good 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 72.7 /100 | #148 | Good 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 72.7 /100 | #149 | Good 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 72.3 /100 | #150 | Good 12.0% |
| Samoans | 71.9 /100 | #151 | Good 12.0% |
| Armenians | 67.6 /100 | #152 | Good 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 63.9 /100 | #153 | Good 12.1% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 63.9 /100 | #154 | Good 12.1% |