Black/African American vs Turkish Female Poverty
COMPARE
Black/African American
Turkish
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Blacks/African Americans
Turks
18.6%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
328th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
46th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Black/African American vs Turkish Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 564,914,608 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Blacks/African Americans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.824 and weighted average of 18.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 271,658,978 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.052 and weighted average of 11.9%, a difference of 56.3%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Black/African American | Turkish |
| Minimum | 11.4% | 0.67% |
| Maximum | 45.5% | 22.9% |
| Range | 34.1% | 22.2% |
| Mean | 21.2% | 10.0% |
| Median | 21.0% | 9.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.9% | 7.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 24.2% | 12.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.3% | 5.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.0% | 4.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.0% | 4.8% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Blacks/African Americans by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Blacks/African Americans are Kiowa (18.6%, a difference of 0.12%), Dominican (19.1%, a difference of 2.9%), Yakama (18.0%, a difference of 3.0%), Central American Indian (18.0%, a difference of 3.1%), and Native/Alaskan (19.2%, a difference of 3.3%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 17.5% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 17.8% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 18.0% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 18.0% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 19.1% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 19.2% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 19.2% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 19.3% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 20.0% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 20.2% |
Demographics Similar to Turks by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (11.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Tongan (11.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Korean (11.9%, a difference of 0.16%), Czech (11.9%, a difference of 0.20%), and Immigrants from Moldova (11.9%, a difference of 0.20%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Poland | 99.3 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Macedonians | 99.3 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Czechs | 99.2 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 99.2 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Koreans | 99.2 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Tongans | 99.2 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.2 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Turks | 99.2 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Asians | 99.1 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.0 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 99.0 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Slovenes | 98.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 98.9 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 98.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 98.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 12.0% |