Bhutanese vs Luxembourger Single Mother Poverty

On this page

Metric Comparison Correlation Chart Correlation Data Summary Similar Demographics Bhutanese Luxembourgers

COMPARE

Bhutanese

Race

Asian Black/African American Hawaiian Hispanic or Latino Native/Alaskan White/Caucasian

Ancestry

Afghan African Alaska Native Alaskan Athabascan Albanian Aleut Alsatian American Apache Arab Arapaho Argentinean Armenian Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac Australian Austrian Bahamian Bangladeshi Barbadian Basque Belgian Belizean BermudanBhutaneseBlackfeet Bolivian Brazilian British British West Indian Bulgarian Burmese Cajun Cambodian Canadian Cape Verdean Carpatho Rusyn Celtic Central American Central American Indian Cherokee Cheyenne Chickasaw Chilean Chinese Chippewa Choctaw Colombian Colville Comanche Costa Rican Cree Creek Croatian Crow Cuban Cypriot Czech Czechoslovakian Danish Delaware Dominican Dutch Dutch West Indian Eastern European Ecuadorian Egyptian English Estonian Ethiopian European Fijian Filipino Finnish French French American Indian French Canadian German German Russian Ghanaian Greek Guamanian/Chamorro Guatemalan Guyanese Haitian Hmong Honduran Hopi Houma Hungarian Icelander Indian (Asian)Indonesian Inupiat Iranian Iraqi Irish Iroquois Israeli Italian Jamaican Japanese Jordanian Kenyan Kiowa Korean Laotian Latvian Lebanese Liberian Lithuanian Lumbee Macedonian Malaysian Maltese Marshallese Menominee Mexican Mexican American Indian Mongolian Moroccan Native Hawaiian Navajo Nepalese New Zealander Nicaraguan Nigerian Northern European Norwegian Okinawan Osage Ottawa Paiute Pakistani Palestinian Panamanian Paraguayan Pennsylvania German Peruvian Pima Polish Portuguese Potawatomi Pueblo Puerto Rican Puget Sound Salish Romanian Russian Salvadoran Samoan Scandinavian Scotch-Irish Scottish Seminole Senegalese Serbian Shoshone Sierra Leonean Sioux Slavic Slovak Slovene Somali South African South American South American Indian Soviet Union Spaniard Spanish Spanish American Spanish American Indian Sri Lankan Subsaharan African Sudanese Swedish Swiss Syrian Taiwanese Thai Tlingit-Haida Tohono O'Odham Tongan Trinidadian and Tobagonian Tsimshian Turkish U.S. Virgin Islander Ugandan Ukrainian Uruguayan Ute Venezuelan Vietnamese Welsh West Indian Yakama Yaqui Yugoslavian Yuman Yup'ik Zimbabwean

Immigration

Nonimmigrants Immigrants Afghanistan Africa Albania Argentina Armenia Asia Australia Austria Bahamas Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Belize Bolivia Bosnia and Herzegovina Brazil Bulgaria Burma/Myanmar Cabo Verde Cambodia Cameroon Canada Caribbean Central America Chile China Colombia Congo Costa Rica Croatia Cuba Czechoslovakia Denmark Dominica Dominican Republic Eastern Africa Eastern Asia Eastern Europe Ecuador Egypt El Salvador England Eritrea Ethiopia Europe Fiji France Germany Ghana Greece Grenada Guatemala Guyana Haiti Honduras Hong Kong Hungary India Indonesia Iran Iraq Ireland Israel Italy Jamaica Japan Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Korea Kuwait Laos Latin America Latvia Lebanon Liberia Lithuania Malaysia Mexico Micronesia Middle Africa Moldova Morocco Nepal Netherlands Nicaragua Nigeria North America North Macedonia Northern Africa Northern Europe Norway Oceania Pakistan Panama Peru Philippines Poland Portugal Romania Russia Saudi Arabia Scotland Senegal Serbia Sierra Leone Singapore Somalia South Africa South America South Central Asia South Eastern Asia Southern Europe Spain Sri Lanka St. Vincent and the Grenadines Sudan Sweden Switzerland Syria Taiwan Thailand Trinidad and Tobago Turkey Uganda Ukraine Uruguay Uzbekistan Venezuela Vietnam West Indies Western Africa Western Asia Western Europe Yemen Zaire Zimbabwe Azores

Luxembourger

Race

Asian Black/African American Hawaiian Hispanic or Latino Native/Alaskan White/Caucasian

Ancestry

Afghan African Alaska Native Alaskan Athabascan Albanian Aleut Alsatian American Apache Arab Arapaho Argentinean Armenian Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac Australian Austrian Bahamian Bangladeshi Barbadian Basque Belgian Belizean Bermudan Blackfeet Bolivian Brazilian British British West Indian Bulgarian Burmese Cajun Cambodian Canadian Cape Verdean Carpatho Rusyn Celtic Central American Central American Indian Cherokee Cheyenne Chickasaw Chilean Chinese Chippewa Choctaw Colombian Colville Comanche Costa Rican Cree Creek Croatian Crow Cuban Cypriot Czech Czechoslovakian Danish Delaware Dominican Dutch Dutch West Indian Eastern European Ecuadorian Egyptian English Estonian Ethiopian European Fijian Filipino Finnish French French American Indian French Canadian German German Russian Ghanaian Greek Guamanian/Chamorro Guatemalan Guyanese Haitian Hmong Honduran Hopi Houma Hungarian Icelander Indian (Asian)Indonesian Inupiat Iranian Iraqi Irish Iroquois Israeli Italian Jamaican Japanese Jordanian Kenyan Kiowa Korean Laotian Latvian Lebanese Liberian Lithuanian LumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonian Malaysian Maltese Marshallese Menominee Mexican Mexican American Indian Mongolian Moroccan Native Hawaiian Navajo Nepalese New Zealander Nicaraguan Nigerian Northern European Norwegian Okinawan Osage Ottawa Paiute Pakistani Palestinian Panamanian Paraguayan Pennsylvania German Peruvian Pima Polish Portuguese Potawatomi Pueblo Puerto Rican Puget Sound Salish Romanian Russian Salvadoran Samoan Scandinavian Scotch-Irish Scottish Seminole Senegalese Serbian Shoshone Sierra Leonean Sioux Slavic Slovak Slovene Somali South African South American South American Indian Soviet Union Spaniard Spanish Spanish American Spanish American Indian Sri Lankan Subsaharan African Sudanese Swedish Swiss Syrian Taiwanese Thai Tlingit-Haida Tohono O'Odham Tongan Trinidadian and Tobagonian Tsimshian Turkish U.S. Virgin Islander Ugandan Ukrainian Uruguayan Ute Venezuelan Vietnamese Welsh West Indian Yakama Yaqui Yugoslavian Yuman Yup'ik Zimbabwean

Immigration

Single Mother Poverty

Social Comparison

Income

Per Capita Income Median Family Income Median Household Income Median Earnings Median Male Earnings Median Female Earnings Householder Income Under 25 years Householder Income Ages 25 - 44 years Householder Income Ages 45 - 64 years Householder Income Over 65 years Wage/Income Gap

Poverty

Poverty Family Poverty Male Poverty Female Poverty Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds Child Poverty Under the Age of 5 Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Single Male Poverty Single Female Poverty Single Father PovertySingle Mother PovertyMarried-Couple Family Poverty Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75 Receiving Food Stamps

Unemployment

Labor Participation

Family Structure

Family Households Family Households with Children Married-couple Households Average Family Size Single Father Households Single Mother Households Currently Married Divorced or Separated Births to Unmarried Women

Vehicle Availability

No Vehicles in Household 1 or more Vehicles in Household 2 or more Vehicles in Household 3 or more Vehicles in Household 4 or more Vehicles in Household

Education Level

No Schooling Completed Nursery School Kindergarten 1st Grade 2nd Grade 3rd Grade 4th Grade 5th Grade 6th Grade 7th Grade 8th Grade 9th Grade 10th Grade 11th Grade 12th Grade, No Diploma High School Diploma GED/Equivalency College, Under 1 year College, 1 year or more Associate's Degree Bachelor's Degree Master's Degree Professional Degree Doctorate Degree

Disability

Disability Male Disability Female Disability Disability Age Under 5 Disability Age 5 to 17 Disability Age 18 to 34 Disability Age 35 to 64 Disability Age 65 to 74 Disability Age Over 75 Vision Disability Hearing Disability Cognitive Disability Ambulatory Disability Self-Care Disability

Single Mother Poverty Comparison

Bhutanese

Luxembourgers

Exceptional

Excellent

25.6%

SINGLE MOTHER POVERTY

100.0/ 100

METRIC RATING

12th/ 347

METRIC RANK

28.5%

SINGLE MOTHER POVERTY

86.4/ 100

METRIC RATING

144th/ 347

METRIC RANK

Bhutanese vs Luxembourger Single Mother Poverty Correlation Chart

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 442,258,638 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and poverty level among single mothers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.201 and weighted average of 25.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 142,536,891 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers and poverty level among single mothers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.567 and weighted average of 28.5%, a difference of 11.3%.

Single Mother Poverty Correlation Summary

Measurement	Bhutanese	Luxembourger
Minimum	2.6%	12.2%
Maximum	73.4%	100.0%
Range	70.8%	87.8%
Mean	24.4%	35.5%
Median	23.4%	29.4%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	15.9%	23.5%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	30.2%	36.2%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	14.3%	12.7%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	11.8%	22.2%
Standard Deviation (Population)	11.8%	21.9%

Similar Demographics by Single Mother Poverty

Demographics Similar to Bhutanese by Single Mother Poverty

In terms of single mother poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Iranian (25.5%, a difference of 0.37%), Indian (Asian) (25.8%, a difference of 0.52%), Immigrants from Singapore (25.8%, a difference of 0.67%), Immigrants from Ireland (25.8%, a difference of 0.86%), and Bolivian (25.9%, a difference of 1.1%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Single Mother Poverty
Immigrants \| Hong Kong	100.0 /100 \| #5	Exceptional 24.4%
Thais	100.0 /100 \| #6	Exceptional 24.5%
Chinese	100.0 /100 \| #7	Exceptional 24.6%
Immigrants \| Iran	100.0 /100 \| #8	Exceptional 25.1%
Immigrants \| Lithuania	100.0 /100 \| #9	Exceptional 25.2%
Immigrants \| South Central Asia	100.0 /100 \| #10	Exceptional 25.3%
Iranians	100.0 /100 \| #11	Exceptional 25.5%
Bhutanese	100.0 /100 \| #12	Exceptional 25.6%
Indians (Asian)	100.0 /100 \| #13	Exceptional 25.8%
Immigrants \| Singapore	100.0 /100 \| #14	Exceptional 25.8%
Immigrants \| Ireland	100.0 /100 \| #15	Exceptional 25.8%
Bolivians	100.0 /100 \| #16	Exceptional 25.9%
Asians	100.0 /100 \| #17	Exceptional 26.0%
Immigrants \| Pakistan	100.0 /100 \| #18	Exceptional 26.0%
Immigrants \| Eastern Asia	100.0 /100 \| #19	Exceptional 26.1%

Demographics Similar to Luxembourgers by Single Mother Poverty

In terms of single mother poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Luxembourgers are Immigrants from North America (28.5%, a difference of 0.010%), South African (28.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from South America (28.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Denmark (28.5%, a difference of 0.040%), and Danish (28.5%, a difference of 0.070%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Single Mother Poverty
Immigrants \| Canada	88.9 /100 \| #137	Excellent 28.4%
Immigrants \| Belgium	88.5 /100 \| #138	Excellent 28.5%
Samoans	88.1 /100 \| #139	Excellent 28.5%
Immigrants \| Colombia	88.0 /100 \| #140	Excellent 28.5%
Danes	87.1 /100 \| #141	Excellent 28.5%
South Africans	86.6 /100 \| #142	Excellent 28.5%
Immigrants \| North America	86.5 /100 \| #143	Excellent 28.5%
Luxembourgers	86.4 /100 \| #144	Excellent 28.5%
Immigrants \| South America	86.1 /100 \| #145	Excellent 28.5%
Immigrants \| Denmark	86.1 /100 \| #146	Excellent 28.5%
Immigrants \| Lebanon	85.3 /100 \| #147	Excellent 28.6%
Syrians	85.3 /100 \| #148	Excellent 28.6%
Serbians	85.0 /100 \| #149	Excellent 28.6%
Northern Europeans	81.7 /100 \| #150	Excellent 28.6%
Immigrants \| Oceania	79.9 /100 \| #151	Good 28.7%