Bhutanese vs Black/African American Female Poverty
COMPARE
Bhutanese
Black/African American
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Bhutanese
Blacks/African Americans
11.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
12th/ 347
METRIC RANK
18.6%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
328th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bhutanese vs Black/African American Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 455,052,143 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.207 and weighted average of 11.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 564,914,608 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Blacks/African Americans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.824 and weighted average of 18.6%, a difference of 64.7%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Bhutanese | Black/African American |
| Minimum | 2.5% | 11.4% |
| Maximum | 66.7% | 45.5% |
| Range | 64.2% | 34.1% |
| Mean | 11.1% | 21.2% |
| Median | 9.4% | 21.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.2% | 16.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.7% | 24.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.6% | 7.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.5% | 6.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.5% | 6.0% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Bhutanese by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Immigrants from Lithuania (11.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Maltese (11.2%, a difference of 0.46%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (11.2%, a difference of 0.57%), Lithuanian (11.4%, a difference of 0.97%), and Latvian (11.4%, a difference of 1.3%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Demographics Similar to Blacks/African Americans by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Blacks/African Americans are Kiowa (18.6%, a difference of 0.12%), Dominican (19.1%, a difference of 2.9%), Yakama (18.0%, a difference of 3.0%), Central American Indian (18.0%, a difference of 3.1%), and Native/Alaskan (19.2%, a difference of 3.3%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 17.5% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 17.8% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 18.0% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 18.0% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 19.1% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 19.2% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 19.2% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 19.3% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 20.0% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 20.2% |