Australian vs Indian (Asian) Receiving Food Stamps
COMPARE
Australian
Indian (Asian)
Receiving Food Stamps
Receiving Food Stamps Comparison
Australians
Indians (Asian)
9.6%
RECEIVING FOOD STAMPS
99.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
46th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.6%
RECEIVING FOOD STAMPS
99.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
47th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Australian vs Indian (Asian) Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,620,943 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Australians and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.069 and weighted average of 9.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 492,865,667 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.116 and weighted average of 9.6%, a difference of 0.070%.
Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Australian | Indian (Asian) |
| Minimum | 2.7% | 1.2% |
| Maximum | 22.7% | 22.2% |
| Range | 20.0% | 21.0% |
| Mean | 10.1% | 8.7% |
| Median | 9.3% | 7.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.9% | 5.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.3% | 10.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.3% | 4.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.1% | 4.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.0% | 4.4% |
Demographics Similar to Australians and Indians (Asian) by Receiving Food Stamps
In terms of receiving food stamps, the demographic groups most similar to Australians are Immigrants from Belgium (9.6%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Denmark (9.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Russian (9.6%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (9.6%, a difference of 0.19%), and Croatian (9.6%, a difference of 0.34%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Indians (Asian) are Russian (9.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (9.6%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Belgium (9.6%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Denmark (9.6%, a difference of 0.17%), and Lithuanian (9.7%, a difference of 0.38%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Receiving Food Stamps |
| Estonians | 99.6 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Europeans | 99.6 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.5 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.5 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 99.5 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Cambodians | 99.5 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Immigrants | China | 99.5 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Croatians | 99.5 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 99.4 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 99.4 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Australians | 99.4 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Indians (Asian) | 99.4 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Russians | 99.4 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.4 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Lithuanians | 99.4 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Asians | 99.3 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 99.3 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Tongans | 99.3 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Swiss | 99.3 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 99.3 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 99.3 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 9.7% |