Armenian vs Yugoslavian Poverty
COMPARE
Armenian
Yugoslavian
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Armenians
Yugoslavians
12.1%
POVERTY
67.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
152nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.8%
POVERTY
85.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
134th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Armenian vs Yugoslavian Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 310,820,657 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Armenians and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.264 and weighted average of 12.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 285,571,582 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Yugoslavians and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.092 and weighted average of 11.8%, a difference of 2.6%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Armenian | Yugoslavian |
Minimum | 2.7% | 2.7% |
Maximum | 19.8% | 27.0% |
Range | 17.1% | 24.3% |
Mean | 11.4% | 10.4% |
Median | 11.4% | 10.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.3% | 7.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.9% | 12.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.6% | 5.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.2% | 4.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.2% | 4.4% |
Demographics Similar to Armenians and Yugoslavians by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Armenians are Immigrants from Northern Africa (12.1%, a difference of 0.41%), Samoan (12.0%, a difference of 0.50%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (12.0%, a difference of 0.55%), Immigrants from Germany (12.0%, a difference of 0.60%), and Immigrants from Malaysia (12.0%, a difference of 0.60%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Yugoslavians are Immigrants from Western Europe (11.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Vietnam (11.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Chilean (11.8%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Switzerland (11.8%, a difference of 0.42%), and Immigrants from Jordan (11.9%, a difference of 0.53%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 85.2 /100 | #133 | Excellent 11.8% |
Yugoslavians | 85.2 /100 | #134 | Excellent 11.8% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 85.2 /100 | #135 | Excellent 11.8% |
Chileans | 84.2 /100 | #136 | Excellent 11.8% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 83.0 /100 | #137 | Excellent 11.8% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 82.4 /100 | #138 | Excellent 11.9% |
Pakistanis | 82.2 /100 | #139 | Excellent 11.9% |
Immigrants | Peru | 81.1 /100 | #140 | Excellent 11.9% |
Immigrants | France | 80.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 11.9% |
Basques | 80.4 /100 | #142 | Excellent 11.9% |
Brazilians | 79.7 /100 | #143 | Good 11.9% |
Icelanders | 77.9 /100 | #144 | Good 11.9% |
Syrians | 75.1 /100 | #145 | Good 12.0% |
Afghans | 74.9 /100 | #146 | Good 12.0% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 73.7 /100 | #147 | Good 12.0% |
Immigrants | Germany | 72.7 /100 | #148 | Good 12.0% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 72.7 /100 | #149 | Good 12.0% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 72.3 /100 | #150 | Good 12.0% |
Samoans | 71.9 /100 | #151 | Good 12.0% |
Armenians | 67.6 /100 | #152 | Good 12.1% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 63.9 /100 | #153 | Good 12.1% |