Alaskan Athabascan vs Immigrants from Ghana Poverty
COMPARE
Alaskan Athabascan
Immigrants from Ghana
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Alaskan Athabascans
Immigrants from Ghana
13.6%
POVERTY
1.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
230th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.2%
POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
249th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Alaskan Athabascan vs Immigrants from Ghana Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,813,239 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.517 and weighted average of 13.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 199,808,032 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ghana and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.137 and weighted average of 14.2%, a difference of 4.3%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Alaskan Athabascan | Immigrants from Ghana |
Minimum | 1.1% | 0.71% |
Maximum | 62.3% | 40.5% |
Range | 61.2% | 39.8% |
Mean | 19.9% | 13.4% |
Median | 16.0% | 12.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.8% | 8.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 26.3% | 16.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 16.5% | 8.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.7% | 7.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.6% | 7.5% |
Demographics Similar to Alaskan Athabascans and Immigrants from Ghana by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Osage (13.6%, a difference of 0.060%), Nigerian (13.6%, a difference of 0.17%), Fijian (13.7%, a difference of 1.2%), Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (13.8%, a difference of 1.5%), and Immigrants from Laos (13.8%, a difference of 1.7%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Ghana are Immigrants from Western Africa (14.1%, a difference of 0.090%), Liberian (14.1%, a difference of 0.11%), Potawatomi (14.1%, a difference of 0.40%), Immigrants from Sudan (14.1%, a difference of 0.59%), and Nepalese (14.0%, a difference of 0.99%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Osage | 1.5 /100 | #229 | Tragic 13.6% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 1.5 /100 | #230 | Tragic 13.6% |
Nigerians | 1.4 /100 | #231 | Tragic 13.6% |
Fijians | 0.8 /100 | #232 | Tragic 13.7% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 0.8 /100 | #233 | Tragic 13.8% |
Immigrants | Laos | 0.7 /100 | #234 | Tragic 13.8% |
Cubans | 0.6 /100 | #235 | Tragic 13.9% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 0.5 /100 | #236 | Tragic 13.9% |
French American Indians | 0.5 /100 | #237 | Tragic 13.9% |
Ghanaians | 0.5 /100 | #238 | Tragic 13.9% |
Nicaraguans | 0.4 /100 | #239 | Tragic 13.9% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.4 /100 | #240 | Tragic 14.0% |
Salvadorans | 0.4 /100 | #241 | Tragic 14.0% |
Ecuadorians | 0.4 /100 | #242 | Tragic 14.0% |
Sudanese | 0.3 /100 | #243 | Tragic 14.0% |
Nepalese | 0.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 14.0% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 0.3 /100 | #245 | Tragic 14.1% |
Potawatomi | 0.3 /100 | #246 | Tragic 14.1% |
Liberians | 0.2 /100 | #247 | Tragic 14.1% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.2 /100 | #248 | Tragic 14.1% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #249 | Tragic 14.2% |