Afghan vs Osage Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Afghan
Osage
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Afghans
Osage
16.2%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
62.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
172nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
18.5%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
1.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
230th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Afghan vs Osage Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,871,316 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Afghans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.507 and weighted average of 16.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,492,643 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Osage and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.094 and weighted average of 18.5%, a difference of 14.1%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Afghan | Osage |
Minimum | 1.2% | 6.7% |
Maximum | 52.3% | 67.2% |
Range | 51.1% | 60.5% |
Mean | 17.5% | 21.1% |
Median | 15.3% | 19.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.0% | 14.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.0% | 24.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.0% | 10.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.0% | 11.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.0% | 11.4% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Afghans by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Afghans are Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (16.2%, a difference of 0.21%), Costa Rican (16.2%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Venezuela (16.2%, a difference of 0.24%), Yugoslavian (16.2%, a difference of 0.26%), and Uruguayan (16.2%, a difference of 0.30%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Germany | 67.3 /100 | #165 | Good 16.1% |
South Americans | 67.2 /100 | #166 | Good 16.1% |
Uruguayans | 64.7 /100 | #167 | Good 16.2% |
Yugoslavians | 64.4 /100 | #168 | Good 16.2% |
Costa Ricans | 64.2 /100 | #169 | Good 16.2% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 64.2 /100 | #170 | Good 16.2% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 64.0 /100 | #171 | Good 16.2% |
Afghans | 62.3 /100 | #172 | Good 16.2% |
Immigrants | South America | 55.1 /100 | #173 | Average 16.4% |
Ethiopians | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 16.5% |
Lebanese | 45.4 /100 | #175 | Average 16.6% |
Hungarians | 45.1 /100 | #176 | Average 16.6% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 44.1 /100 | #177 | Average 16.6% |
Whites/Caucasians | 43.6 /100 | #178 | Average 16.6% |
Hawaiians | 43.4 /100 | #179 | Average 16.6% |
Demographics Similar to Osage by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Osage are Cree (18.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Ghanaian (18.5%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Sudan (18.6%, a difference of 0.32%), Sudanese (18.6%, a difference of 0.37%), and Fijian (18.6%, a difference of 0.43%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Armenia | 2.9 /100 | #223 | Tragic 18.1% |
Bermudans | 2.8 /100 | #224 | Tragic 18.1% |
Immigrants | Africa | 2.7 /100 | #225 | Tragic 18.2% |
Nicaraguans | 2.4 /100 | #226 | Tragic 18.2% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 2.0 /100 | #227 | Tragic 18.3% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 2.0 /100 | #228 | Tragic 18.3% |
Ghanaians | 1.4 /100 | #229 | Tragic 18.5% |
Osage | 1.3 /100 | #230 | Tragic 18.5% |
Cree | 1.3 /100 | #231 | Tragic 18.5% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 1.1 /100 | #232 | Tragic 18.6% |
Sudanese | 1.1 /100 | #233 | Tragic 18.6% |
Fijians | 1.1 /100 | #234 | Tragic 18.6% |
Nepalese | 1.1 /100 | #235 | Tragic 18.6% |
Alsatians | 1.1 /100 | #236 | Tragic 18.6% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 1.0 /100 | #237 | Tragic 18.6% |