Yakama vs Pima In Labor Force | Age 25-29
COMPARE
Yakama
Pima
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 Comparison
Yakama
Pima
80.6%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 25-29
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
329th/ 347
METRIC RANK
74.3%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 25-29
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
346th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Yakama vs Pima In Labor Force | Age 25-29 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 19,913,753 people shows a strong negative correlation between the proportion of Yakama and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 25 and 29 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.739 and weighted average of 80.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,533,053 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 25 and 29 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.082 and weighted average of 74.3%, a difference of 8.5%.
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Yakama | Pima |
Minimum | 52.5% | 14.8% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 47.5% | 85.2% |
Mean | 80.8% | 75.8% |
Median | 81.8% | 80.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 77.1% | 66.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 87.4% | 95.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.3% | 29.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.3% | 22.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.0% | 21.9% |
Demographics Similar to Yakama and Pima by In Labor Force | Age 25-29
In terms of in labor force | age 25-29, the demographic groups most similar to Yakama are Creek (80.7%, a difference of 0.11%), Puerto Rican (80.4%, a difference of 0.23%), Ute (80.8%, a difference of 0.26%), Cheyenne (80.3%, a difference of 0.37%), and Inupiat (79.8%, a difference of 1.1%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Navajo (74.6%, a difference of 0.48%), Yup'ik (73.1%, a difference of 1.7%), Hopi (76.5%, a difference of 3.0%), Arapaho (76.6%, a difference of 3.1%), and Pueblo (77.5%, a difference of 4.3%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 25-29 |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 80.8% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 80.7% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 80.6% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 80.4% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 80.3% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 79.8% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 79.7% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 79.3% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 79.3% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 79.2% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 78.6% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 78.3% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 78.2% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 78.1% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 77.5% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 77.5% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 76.6% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 76.5% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 74.6% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 74.3% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 73.1% |