Tlingit-Haida vs Immigrants from Jordan In Labor Force | Age 25-29

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,865,267 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Tlingit-Haida and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 25 and 29 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.176 and weighted average of 84.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 181,276,232 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jordan and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 25 and 29 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.295 and weighted average of 84.4%, a difference of 0.090%.

In Labor Force | Age 25-29 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Tlingit-Haida	Immigrants from Jordan
Minimum	25.0%	58.5%
Maximum	100.0%	100.0%
Range	75.0%	41.5%
Mean	81.4%	83.6%
Median	85.8%	84.7%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	79.3%	80.7%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	95.2%	86.9%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	15.8%	6.2%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	19.9%	8.8%
Standard Deviation (Population)	19.6%	8.7%

Demographics Similar to Tlingit-Haida and Immigrants from Jordan by In Labor Force | Age 25-29

In terms of in labor force | age 25-29, the demographic groups most similar to Tlingit-Haida are Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (84.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Iraq (84.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Germany (84.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Portuguese (84.4%, a difference of 0.020%), and Immigrants from Israel (84.4%, a difference of 0.020%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Jordan are Chinese (84.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Venezuela (84.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Armenia (84.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Indonesia (84.4%, a difference of 0.010%), and Immigrants from Cambodia (84.4%, a difference of 0.020%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	In Labor Force \| Age 25-29
South American Indians	25.0 /100 \| #193	Fair 84.5%
Portuguese	21.2 /100 \| #194	Fair 84.4%
Immigrants \| Israel	20.8 /100 \| #195	Fair 84.4%
Immigrants \| South Eastern Asia	19.5 /100 \| #196	Poor 84.4%
Tlingit-Haida	19.3 /100 \| #197	Poor 84.4%
Immigrants \| Iraq	19.0 /100 \| #198	Poor 84.4%
Immigrants \| Germany	18.3 /100 \| #199	Poor 84.4%
Immigrants \| Kazakhstan	17.5 /100 \| #200	Poor 84.4%
Laotians	16.6 /100 \| #201	Poor 84.4%
Afghans	15.9 /100 \| #202	Poor 84.4%
Immigrants \| Afghanistan	15.6 /100 \| #203	Poor 84.4%
Venezuelans	15.1 /100 \| #204	Poor 84.4%
Ecuadorians	14.8 /100 \| #205	Poor 84.4%
Immigrants \| Cambodia	14.3 /100 \| #206	Poor 84.4%
Immigrants \| Armenia	13.3 /100 \| #207	Poor 84.4%
Immigrants \| Indonesia	13.2 /100 \| #208	Poor 84.4%
Immigrants \| Jordan	12.8 /100 \| #209	Poor 84.4%
Chinese	12.7 /100 \| #210	Poor 84.3%
Immigrants \| Venezuela	12.6 /100 \| #211	Poor 84.3%
Sub-Saharan Africans	11.7 /100 \| #212	Poor 84.3%
Japanese	11.4 /100 \| #213	Poor 84.3%