Russian vs Immigrants from Asia In Labor Force | Age 20-64

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 512,263,785 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Russians and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.304 and weighted average of 80.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 549,180,709 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Asia and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.186 and weighted average of 80.1%, a difference of 0.030%.

In Labor Force | Age 20-64 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Russian	Immigrants from Asia
Minimum	49.3%	67.8%
Maximum	100.0%	100.0%
Range	50.7%	32.2%
Mean	80.7%	80.6%
Median	80.5%	80.5%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	74.4%	78.9%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	86.5%	81.2%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	12.0%	2.3%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	11.2%	3.9%
Standard Deviation (Population)	11.2%	3.9%

Demographics Similar to Russians and Immigrants from Asia by In Labor Force | Age 20-64

In terms of in labor force | age 20-64, the demographic groups most similar to Russians are Palestinian (80.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Australia (80.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Chile (80.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Filipino (80.1%, a difference of 0.010%), and Venezuelan (80.0%, a difference of 0.010%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Asia are Yugoslavian (80.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Malaysia (80.1%, a difference of 0.010%), South American (80.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Uruguay (80.1%, a difference of 0.010%), and Immigrants from Belarus (80.1%, a difference of 0.020%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	In Labor Force \| Age 20-64
Chileans	97.0 /100 \| #88	Exceptional 80.1%
Immigrants \| Venezuela	96.8 /100 \| #89	Exceptional 80.1%
Poles	96.8 /100 \| #90	Exceptional 80.1%
Uruguayans	96.7 /100 \| #91	Exceptional 80.1%
Ghanaians	96.7 /100 \| #92	Exceptional 80.1%
Immigrants \| Belarus	96.4 /100 \| #93	Exceptional 80.1%
Immigrants \| Asia	96.0 /100 \| #94	Exceptional 80.1%
Yugoslavians	95.9 /100 \| #95	Exceptional 80.1%
Immigrants \| Malaysia	95.9 /100 \| #96	Exceptional 80.1%
South Americans	95.9 /100 \| #97	Exceptional 80.1%
Immigrants \| Uruguay	95.8 /100 \| #98	Exceptional 80.1%
Immigrants \| Chile	95.7 /100 \| #99	Exceptional 80.1%
Filipinos	95.6 /100 \| #100	Exceptional 80.1%
Palestinians	95.5 /100 \| #101	Exceptional 80.0%
Immigrants \| Australia	95.5 /100 \| #102	Exceptional 80.0%
Russians	95.5 /100 \| #103	Exceptional 80.0%
Venezuelans	95.3 /100 \| #104	Exceptional 80.0%
Immigrants \| Ghana	95.0 /100 \| #105	Exceptional 80.0%
Greeks	94.8 /100 \| #106	Exceptional 80.0%
Immigrants \| Jordan	94.8 /100 \| #107	Exceptional 80.0%
Iranians	94.3 /100 \| #108	Exceptional 80.0%