Indian (Asian) vs Guatemalan In Labor Force | Age > 16
COMPARE
Indian (Asian)
Guatemalan
In Labor Force | Age > 16
In Labor Force | Age > 16 Comparison
Indians (Asian)
Guatemalans
65.5%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE > 16
89.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
142nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
65.6%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE > 16
92.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
135th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Indian (Asian) vs Guatemalan In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 495,373,057 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.440 and weighted average of 65.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 409,569,412 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Guatemalans and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.032 and weighted average of 65.6%, a difference of 0.10%.
In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Indian (Asian) | Guatemalan |
Minimum | 46.3% | 44.5% |
Maximum | 82.9% | 83.5% |
Range | 36.6% | 39.0% |
Mean | 64.1% | 64.4% |
Median | 64.5% | 65.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 61.3% | 61.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 66.6% | 67.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.4% | 5.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.2% | 6.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.1% | 6.6% |
Demographics Similar to Indians (Asian) and Guatemalans by In Labor Force | Age > 16
In terms of in labor force | age > 16, the demographic groups most similar to Indians (Asian) are Latvian (65.5%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Romania (65.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Samoan (65.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Tlingit-Haida (65.5%, a difference of 0.030%), and Immigrants from Taiwan (65.5%, a difference of 0.040%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Guatemalans are Immigrants from Argentina (65.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Guamanian/Chamorro (65.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from West Indies (65.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Costa Rican (65.6%, a difference of 0.030%), and Immigrants from Lithuania (65.6%, a difference of 0.040%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age > 16 |
Ecuadorians | 94.7 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 94.5 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 94.4 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Icelanders | 94.3 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 94.1 /100 | #132 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 93.5 /100 | #133 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Costa Ricans | 93.2 /100 | #134 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Guatemalans | 92.5 /100 | #135 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 92.4 /100 | #136 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 92.4 /100 | #137 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 92.0 /100 | #138 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 90.8 /100 | #139 | Exceptional 65.5% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 90.8 /100 | #140 | Exceptional 65.5% |
Samoans | 90.5 /100 | #141 | Exceptional 65.5% |
Indians (Asian) | 89.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 65.5% |
Latvians | 89.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 65.5% |
Immigrants | Romania | 88.6 /100 | #144 | Excellent 65.5% |
Tlingit-Haida | 88.3 /100 | #145 | Excellent 65.5% |
Cypriots | 88.2 /100 | #146 | Excellent 65.5% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 87.5 /100 | #147 | Excellent 65.5% |
Bhutanese | 86.3 /100 | #148 | Excellent 65.5% |