Chinese vs Slavic In Labor Force | Age > 16
COMPARE
Chinese
Slavic
In Labor Force | Age > 16
In Labor Force | Age > 16 Comparison
Chinese
Slavs
64.7%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE > 16
7.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
230th/ 347
METRIC RANK
64.6%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE > 16
4.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
233rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chinese vs Slavic In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,809,883 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.573 and weighted average of 64.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 270,879,770 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Slavs and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.465 and weighted average of 64.6%, a difference of 0.12%.
In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chinese | Slavic |
Minimum | 38.6% | 26.3% |
Maximum | 72.9% | 76.4% |
Range | 34.3% | 50.1% |
Mean | 62.4% | 58.7% |
Median | 63.3% | 61.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 60.5% | 51.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 65.9% | 65.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.4% | 14.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.4% | 10.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.4% | 10.2% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese and Slavs by In Labor Force | Age > 16
In terms of in labor force | age > 16, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are British (64.7%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (64.7%, a difference of 0.0%), European (64.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Polish (64.7%, a difference of 0.040%), and Northern European (64.7%, a difference of 0.040%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Slavs are Vietnamese (64.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Austrian (64.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Norway (64.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Italian (64.6%, a difference of 0.020%), and African (64.6%, a difference of 0.050%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age > 16 |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 9.6 /100 | #221 | Tragic 64.7% |
Hawaiians | 9.3 /100 | #222 | Tragic 64.7% |
Immigrants | Belize | 9.2 /100 | #223 | Tragic 64.7% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 8.8 /100 | #224 | Tragic 64.7% |
Croatians | 8.8 /100 | #225 | Tragic 64.7% |
Europeans | 8.3 /100 | #226 | Tragic 64.7% |
Poles | 8.3 /100 | #227 | Tragic 64.7% |
Northern Europeans | 8.2 /100 | #228 | Tragic 64.7% |
British | 7.3 /100 | #229 | Tragic 64.7% |
Chinese | 7.3 /100 | #230 | Tragic 64.7% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 7.2 /100 | #231 | Tragic 64.7% |
Africans | 5.8 /100 | #232 | Tragic 64.6% |
Slavs | 4.9 /100 | #233 | Tragic 64.6% |
Vietnamese | 4.7 /100 | #234 | Tragic 64.6% |
Austrians | 4.6 /100 | #235 | Tragic 64.6% |
Immigrants | Norway | 4.6 /100 | #236 | Tragic 64.6% |
Italians | 4.6 /100 | #237 | Tragic 64.6% |
Lebanese | 3.9 /100 | #238 | Tragic 64.5% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 3.8 /100 | #239 | Tragic 64.5% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 3.6 /100 | #240 | Tragic 64.5% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 3.5 /100 | #241 | Tragic 64.5% |