Cherokee vs Iroquois In Labor Force | Age 16-19
COMPARE
Cherokee
Iroquois
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 Comparison
Cherokee
Iroquois
40.2%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 16-19
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
62nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
39.9%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 16-19
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
72nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cherokee vs Iroquois In Labor Force | Age 16-19 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 492,065,053 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Cherokee and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 16 and 19 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.191 and weighted average of 40.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 207,097,008 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 16 and 19 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.218 and weighted average of 39.9%, a difference of 0.73%.
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Cherokee | Iroquois |
| Minimum | 14.7% | 10.4% |
| Maximum | 82.7% | 100.0% |
| Range | 68.0% | 89.6% |
| Mean | 39.1% | 47.1% |
| Median | 40.3% | 43.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 32.8% | 35.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 44.6% | 55.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.9% | 19.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.3% | 22.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.3% | 22.0% |
Demographics Similar to Cherokee and Iroquois by In Labor Force | Age 16-19
In terms of in labor force | age 16-19, the demographic groups most similar to Cherokee are Northern European (40.2%, a difference of 0.060%), American (40.3%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Micronesia (40.2%, a difference of 0.17%), Kenyan (40.1%, a difference of 0.25%), and Immigrants from Eastern Africa (40.4%, a difference of 0.29%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Iroquois are Serbian (39.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Middle Africa (39.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Portuguese (40.0%, a difference of 0.17%), Potawatomi (40.0%, a difference of 0.22%), and Hungarian (39.8%, a difference of 0.26%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 16-19 |
| Lithuanians | 100.0 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 40.4% |
| Aleuts | 100.0 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 40.4% |
| Slavs | 100.0 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 40.4% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 100.0 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 40.4% |
| Americans | 100.0 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 40.3% |
| Cherokee | 100.0 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 40.2% |
| Northern Europeans | 100.0 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 40.2% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 100.0 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 40.2% |
| Kenyans | 100.0 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 40.1% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 100.0 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 40.1% |
| Canadians | 100.0 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 40.1% |
| Italians | 99.9 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 40.1% |
| Potawatomi | 99.9 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 40.0% |
| Portuguese | 99.9 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 40.0% |
| Serbians | 99.9 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 39.9% |
| Iroquois | 99.9 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 39.9% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 99.9 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 39.9% |
| Hungarians | 99.9 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 39.8% |
| French American Indians | 99.9 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 39.8% |
| Malaysians | 99.9 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 39.7% |
| Immigrants | Portugal | 99.9 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 39.7% |