Alaskan Athabascan vs Chinese Per Capita Income
COMPARE
Alaskan Athabascan
Chinese
Per Capita Income
Per Capita Income Comparison
Alaskan Athabascans
Chinese
$39,163
PER CAPITA INCOME
0.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
260th/ 347
METRIC RANK
$46,098
PER CAPITA INCOME
93.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
117th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Alaskan Athabascan vs Chinese Per Capita Income Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,821,401 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and per capita income in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.530 and weighted average of $39,163. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,809,125 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese and per capita income in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.203 and weighted average of $46,098, a difference of 17.7%.
Per Capita Income Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Alaskan Athabascan | Chinese |
| Minimum | $11,811 | $22,765 |
| Maximum | $61,991 | $76,789 |
| Range | $50,180 | $54,024 |
| Mean | $31,098 | $44,105 |
| Median | $31,460 | $44,514 |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | $21,337 | $38,432 |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | $38,931 | $49,089 |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | $17,594 | $10,657 |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | $11,398 | $10,226 |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | $11,320 | $10,137 |
Similar Demographics by Per Capita Income
Demographics Similar to Alaskan Athabascans by Per Capita Income
In terms of per capita income, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Malaysian ($39,194, a difference of 0.080%), Marshallese ($39,108, a difference of 0.14%), Iroquois ($39,104, a difference of 0.15%), Jamaican ($39,231, a difference of 0.17%), and Belizean ($39,097, a difference of 0.17%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Per Capita Income |
| Osage | 1.0 /100 | #253 | Tragic $39,568 |
| Alaska Natives | 1.0 /100 | #254 | Tragic $39,558 |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 1.0 /100 | #255 | Tragic $39,529 |
| Hawaiians | 0.8 /100 | #256 | Tragic $39,403 |
| Nicaraguans | 0.8 /100 | #257 | Tragic $39,372 |
| Jamaicans | 0.7 /100 | #258 | Tragic $39,231 |
| Malaysians | 0.7 /100 | #259 | Tragic $39,194 |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.6 /100 | #260 | Tragic $39,163 |
| Marshallese | 0.6 /100 | #261 | Tragic $39,108 |
| Iroquois | 0.6 /100 | #262 | Tragic $39,104 |
| Belizeans | 0.6 /100 | #263 | Tragic $39,097 |
| Americans | 0.6 /100 | #264 | Tragic $39,039 |
| Spanish Americans | 0.5 /100 | #265 | Tragic $39,012 |
| Salvadorans | 0.5 /100 | #266 | Tragic $38,858 |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 0.4 /100 | #267 | Tragic $38,848 |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Per Capita Income
In terms of per capita income, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Polish ($46,123, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Saudi Arabia ($46,008, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Chile ($46,213, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Poland ($45,979, a difference of 0.26%), and Afghan ($46,268, a difference of 0.37%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Per Capita Income |
| Chileans | 95.9 /100 | #110 | Exceptional $46,459 |
| Taiwanese | 95.8 /100 | #111 | Exceptional $46,455 |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 95.7 /100 | #112 | Exceptional $46,430 |
| Immigrants | Albania | 95.5 /100 | #113 | Exceptional $46,387 |
| Afghans | 94.9 /100 | #114 | Exceptional $46,268 |
| Immigrants | Chile | 94.6 /100 | #115 | Exceptional $46,213 |
| Poles | 94.1 /100 | #116 | Exceptional $46,123 |
| Chinese | 93.9 /100 | #117 | Exceptional $46,098 |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 93.3 /100 | #118 | Exceptional $46,008 |
| Immigrants | Poland | 93.1 /100 | #119 | Exceptional $45,979 |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 92.7 /100 | #120 | Exceptional $45,923 |
| Canadians | 92.2 /100 | #121 | Exceptional $45,858 |
| Moroccans | 92.1 /100 | #122 | Exceptional $45,854 |
| Lebanese | 92.0 /100 | #123 | Exceptional $45,840 |
| Europeans | 92.0 /100 | #124 | Exceptional $45,836 |