Yugoslavian vs Chilean Births to Unmarried Women
COMPARE
Yugoslavian
Chilean
Births to Unmarried Women
Births to Unmarried Women Comparison
Yugoslavians
Chileans
30.8%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
75.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
154th/ 347
METRIC RANK
30.7%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
79.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
148th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Yugoslavian vs Chilean Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 270,567,772 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Yugoslavians and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.405 and weighted average of 30.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 245,289,700 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Chileans and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.644 and weighted average of 30.7%, a difference of 0.55%.
Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Yugoslavian | Chilean |
| Minimum | 11.7% | 10.9% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 88.3% | 89.1% |
| Mean | 39.8% | 40.9% |
| Median | 31.3% | 32.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 25.4% | 27.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 46.8% | 44.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 21.4% | 17.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 23.8% | 23.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 23.5% | 23.4% |
Demographics Similar to Yugoslavians and Chileans by Births to Unmarried Women
In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Yugoslavians are British (30.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Polish (30.8%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Bangladesh (30.9%, a difference of 0.15%), Carpatho Rusyn (30.9%, a difference of 0.20%), and Italian (30.8%, a difference of 0.25%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chileans are Serbian (30.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Somali (30.7%, a difference of 0.19%), Italian (30.8%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Oceania (30.6%, a difference of 0.33%), and Northern European (30.6%, a difference of 0.36%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Births to Unmarried Women |
| Pakistanis | 83.0 /100 | #141 | Excellent 30.5% |
| South Africans | 82.7 /100 | #142 | Excellent 30.5% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 82.6 /100 | #143 | Excellent 30.5% |
| Czechs | 82.1 /100 | #144 | Excellent 30.5% |
| Immigrants | North America | 81.5 /100 | #145 | Excellent 30.6% |
| Northern Europeans | 81.4 /100 | #146 | Excellent 30.6% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 81.2 /100 | #147 | Excellent 30.6% |
| Chileans | 79.1 /100 | #148 | Good 30.7% |
| Serbians | 78.8 /100 | #149 | Good 30.7% |
| Somalis | 77.8 /100 | #150 | Good 30.7% |
| Italians | 77.0 /100 | #151 | Good 30.8% |
| Poles | 76.2 /100 | #152 | Good 30.8% |
| British | 76.0 /100 | #153 | Good 30.8% |
| Yugoslavians | 75.1 /100 | #154 | Good 30.8% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 73.9 /100 | #155 | Good 30.9% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 73.5 /100 | #156 | Good 30.9% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 72.1 /100 | #157 | Good 31.0% |
| Austrians | 69.9 /100 | #158 | Good 31.0% |
| Immigrants | England | 69.4 /100 | #159 | Good 31.1% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 69.3 /100 | #160 | Good 31.1% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 68.7 /100 | #161 | Good 31.1% |