White/Caucasian vs Creek Births to Unmarried Women
COMPARE
White/Caucasian
Creek
Births to Unmarried Women
Births to Unmarried Women Comparison
Whites/Caucasians
Creek
33.3%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
10.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
209th/ 347
METRIC RANK
37.6%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
287th/ 347
METRIC RANK
White/Caucasian vs Creek Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 513,410,964 people shows a strong negative correlation between the proportion of Whites/Caucasians and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.751 and weighted average of 33.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 173,524,470 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Creek and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.727 and weighted average of 37.6%, a difference of 13.0%.
Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Summary
Measurement | White/Caucasian | Creek |
Minimum | 26.1% | 7.7% |
Maximum | 82.1% | 100.0% |
Range | 56.0% | 92.3% |
Mean | 40.4% | 50.2% |
Median | 37.8% | 45.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 31.7% | 34.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 45.8% | 60.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 14.1% | 25.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.2% | 25.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.2% | 25.0% |
Similar Demographics by Births to Unmarried Women
Demographics Similar to Whites/Caucasians by Births to Unmarried Women
In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Whites/Caucasians are Scotch-Irish (33.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Ecuadorian (33.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Celtic (33.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Hawaiian (33.2%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Sudan (33.2%, a difference of 0.17%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Births to Unmarried Women |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 16.6 /100 | #202 | Poor 32.9% |
Ute | 14.4 /100 | #203 | Poor 33.0% |
Immigrants | Africa | 14.3 /100 | #204 | Poor 33.0% |
German Russians | 13.1 /100 | #205 | Poor 33.1% |
Uruguayans | 12.8 /100 | #206 | Poor 33.1% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 11.5 /100 | #207 | Poor 33.2% |
Hawaiians | 11.3 /100 | #208 | Poor 33.2% |
Whites/Caucasians | 10.7 /100 | #209 | Poor 33.3% |
Scotch-Irish | 10.7 /100 | #210 | Poor 33.3% |
Ecuadorians | 10.5 /100 | #211 | Poor 33.3% |
Celtics | 10.2 /100 | #212 | Poor 33.3% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 9.5 /100 | #213 | Tragic 33.4% |
Slovaks | 9.3 /100 | #214 | Tragic 33.4% |
French | 8.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 33.4% |
Nepalese | 7.8 /100 | #216 | Tragic 33.5% |
Demographics Similar to Creek by Births to Unmarried Women
In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Immigrants from Liberia (37.6%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Guatemala (37.5%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Mexico (37.5%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Central America (37.4%, a difference of 0.35%), and Alaskan Athabascan (37.7%, a difference of 0.40%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Births to Unmarried Women |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.1 /100 | #280 | Tragic 37.3% |
Immigrants | Belize | 0.1 /100 | #281 | Tragic 37.3% |
Liberians | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 37.4% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 37.4% |
Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 37.4% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 37.5% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 37.5% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 37.6% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 37.6% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 37.7% |
Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 37.8% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 37.9% |
Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 37.9% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 38.0% |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 38.0% |