Tsimshian vs Czechoslovakian Family Households with Children
COMPARE
Tsimshian
Czechoslovakian
Family Households with Children
Family Households with Children Comparison
Tsimshian
Czechoslovakians
27.0%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
6.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
227th/ 347
METRIC RANK
27.0%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
6.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
226th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Tsimshian vs Czechoslovakian Family Households with Children Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,626,544 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.145 and weighted average of 27.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 368,397,226 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.225 and weighted average of 27.0%, a difference of 0.0%.
Family Households with Children Correlation Summary
Measurement | Tsimshian | Czechoslovakian |
Minimum | 13.6% | 3.0% |
Maximum | 35.4% | 58.5% |
Range | 21.9% | 55.4% |
Mean | 25.9% | 23.5% |
Median | 26.6% | 24.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 24.2% | 19.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 28.8% | 27.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.6% | 8.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.2% | 11.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.1% | 11.3% |
Demographics Similar to Tsimshian and Czechoslovakians by Family Households with Children
In terms of family households with children, the demographic groups most similar to Tsimshian are Scottish (27.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Caribbean (27.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Canadian (27.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Bulgarian (27.0%, a difference of 0.080%), and Luxembourger (27.0%, a difference of 0.11%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Scottish (27.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Caribbean (27.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Canadian (27.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Bulgarian (27.0%, a difference of 0.080%), and Luxembourger (27.0%, a difference of 0.11%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households with Children |
Cubans | 12.2 /100 | #216 | Poor 27.1% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 12.1 /100 | #217 | Poor 27.1% |
Greeks | 11.4 /100 | #218 | Poor 27.1% |
Immigrants | Japan | 10.7 /100 | #219 | Poor 27.1% |
Austrians | 9.9 /100 | #220 | Tragic 27.1% |
New Zealanders | 9.6 /100 | #221 | Tragic 27.1% |
Paraguayans | 9.4 /100 | #222 | Tragic 27.1% |
Pima | 9.2 /100 | #223 | Tragic 27.1% |
Germans | 8.7 /100 | #224 | Tragic 27.1% |
Canadians | 7.5 /100 | #225 | Tragic 27.1% |
Czechoslovakians | 6.6 /100 | #226 | Tragic 27.0% |
Tsimshian | 6.6 /100 | #227 | Tragic 27.0% |
Scottish | 6.5 /100 | #228 | Tragic 27.0% |
Immigrants | Caribbean | 6.3 /100 | #229 | Tragic 27.0% |
Bulgarians | 5.8 /100 | #230 | Tragic 27.0% |
Luxembourgers | 5.5 /100 | #231 | Tragic 27.0% |
Yugoslavians | 5.1 /100 | #232 | Tragic 27.0% |
Immigrants | Italy | 5.0 /100 | #233 | Tragic 27.0% |
Immigrants | Germany | 4.4 /100 | #234 | Tragic 27.0% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 4.2 /100 | #235 | Tragic 27.0% |
Cape Verdeans | 3.6 /100 | #236 | Tragic 26.9% |