Scandinavian vs Immigrants from Liberia Family Households with Children

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 472,042,007 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Scandinavians and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.611 and weighted average of 28.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 135,222,977 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Liberia and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.106 and weighted average of 28.2%, a difference of 0.88%.

Family Households with Children Correlation Summary

Measurement	Scandinavian	Immigrants from Liberia
Minimum	8.1%	10.6%
Maximum	100.0%	37.5%
Range	91.9%	26.9%
Mean	32.9%	27.4%
Median	28.0%	28.0%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	23.4%	25.1%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	36.4%	30.4%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	13.0%	5.4%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	18.1%	4.7%
Standard Deviation (Population)	17.9%	4.7%

Demographics Similar to Scandinavians and Immigrants from Liberia by Family Households with Children

In terms of family households with children, the demographic groups most similar to Scandinavians are Spaniard (28.0%, a difference of 0.060%), Tohono O'odham (28.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (28.0%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Uganda (28.0%, a difference of 0.12%), and Immigrants from South America (28.0%, a difference of 0.19%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Liberia are Chickasaw (28.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Panamanian (28.2%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Colombia (28.2%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (28.2%, a difference of 0.24%), and Ute (28.2%, a difference of 0.27%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Family Households with Children
Immigrants \| Liberia	99.4 /100 \| #91	Exceptional 28.2%
Chickasaw	99.4 /100 \| #92	Exceptional 28.2%
Panamanians	99.3 /100 \| #93	Exceptional 28.2%
Immigrants \| Colombia	99.2 /100 \| #94	Exceptional 28.2%
Immigrants \| Nicaragua	99.1 /100 \| #95	Exceptional 28.2%
Ute	99.1 /100 \| #96	Exceptional 28.2%
Chileans	98.9 /100 \| #97	Exceptional 28.1%
Immigrants \| Kenya	98.9 /100 \| #98	Exceptional 28.1%
Immigrants \| Azores	98.8 /100 \| #99	Exceptional 28.1%
Indonesians	98.8 /100 \| #100	Exceptional 28.1%
Immigrants \| Oceania	98.8 /100 \| #101	Exceptional 28.1%
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs	98.7 /100 \| #102	Exceptional 28.1%
Palestinians	98.5 /100 \| #103	Exceptional 28.1%
Sioux	98.3 /100 \| #104	Exceptional 28.1%
Choctaw	98.3 /100 \| #105	Exceptional 28.1%
Immigrants \| South America	98.0 /100 \| #106	Exceptional 28.0%
Immigrants \| Uganda	97.7 /100 \| #107	Exceptional 28.0%
Immigrants \| Burma/Myanmar	97.7 /100 \| #108	Exceptional 28.0%
Tohono O'odham	97.6 /100 \| #109	Exceptional 28.0%
Spaniards	97.4 /100 \| #110	Exceptional 28.0%
Scandinavians	97.1 /100 \| #111	Exceptional 28.0%