Navajo vs Luxembourger Family Households with Children
COMPARE
Navajo
Luxembourger
Family Households with Children
Family Households with Children Comparison
Navajo
Luxembourgers
26.9%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
3.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
241st/ 347
METRIC RANK
27.0%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
5.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
231st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Navajo vs Luxembourger Family Households with Children Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,710,255 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Navajo and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.122 and weighted average of 26.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,627,204 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.126 and weighted average of 27.0%, a difference of 0.31%.
Family Households with Children Correlation Summary
Measurement | Navajo | Luxembourger |
Minimum | 2.9% | 5.4% |
Maximum | 60.3% | 52.5% |
Range | 57.4% | 47.1% |
Mean | 25.9% | 25.5% |
Median | 26.0% | 26.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 20.8% | 21.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 29.8% | 29.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.9% | 7.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.0% | 8.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.9% | 8.1% |
Demographics Similar to Navajo and Luxembourgers by Family Households with Children
In terms of family households with children, the demographic groups most similar to Navajo are Immigrants from England (26.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Bulgaria (26.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (26.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Moroccan (26.9%, a difference of 0.030%), and Immigrants from Netherlands (26.9%, a difference of 0.040%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Luxembourgers are Bulgarian (27.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Yugoslavian (27.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Italy (27.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Caribbean (27.0%, a difference of 0.080%), and Scottish (27.0%, a difference of 0.10%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households with Children |
Czechoslovakians | 6.6 /100 | #226 | Tragic 27.0% |
Tsimshian | 6.6 /100 | #227 | Tragic 27.0% |
Scottish | 6.5 /100 | #228 | Tragic 27.0% |
Immigrants | Caribbean | 6.3 /100 | #229 | Tragic 27.0% |
Bulgarians | 5.8 /100 | #230 | Tragic 27.0% |
Luxembourgers | 5.5 /100 | #231 | Tragic 27.0% |
Yugoslavians | 5.1 /100 | #232 | Tragic 27.0% |
Immigrants | Italy | 5.0 /100 | #233 | Tragic 27.0% |
Immigrants | Germany | 4.4 /100 | #234 | Tragic 27.0% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 4.2 /100 | #235 | Tragic 27.0% |
Cape Verdeans | 3.6 /100 | #236 | Tragic 26.9% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 3.5 /100 | #237 | Tragic 26.9% |
Moroccans | 3.4 /100 | #238 | Tragic 26.9% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 3.4 /100 | #239 | Tragic 26.9% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 3.3 /100 | #240 | Tragic 26.9% |
Navajo | 3.2 /100 | #241 | Tragic 26.9% |
Immigrants | England | 3.2 /100 | #242 | Tragic 26.9% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 2.9 /100 | #243 | Tragic 26.9% |
Ukrainians | 2.9 /100 | #244 | Tragic 26.9% |
Australians | 2.8 /100 | #245 | Tragic 26.9% |
Jamaicans | 2.5 /100 | #246 | Tragic 26.9% |