Indian (Asian) vs Ugandan Family Households with Children
COMPARE
Indian (Asian)
Ugandan
Family Households with Children
Family Households with Children Comparison
Indians (Asian)
Ugandans
27.6%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
71.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
157th/ 347
METRIC RANK
27.4%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
49.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
177th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Indian (Asian) vs Ugandan Family Households with Children Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 494,524,246 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.150 and weighted average of 27.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 93,993,745 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Ugandans and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.113 and weighted average of 27.4%, a difference of 0.53%.
Family Households with Children Correlation Summary
Measurement | Indian (Asian) | Ugandan |
Minimum | 11.1% | 16.6% |
Maximum | 55.9% | 47.7% |
Range | 44.9% | 31.1% |
Mean | 27.7% | 28.4% |
Median | 27.8% | 27.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 25.6% | 24.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 29.9% | 30.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.3% | 5.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.9% | 6.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.9% | 6.6% |
Demographics Similar to Indians (Asian) and Ugandans by Family Households with Children
In terms of family households with children, the demographic groups most similar to Indians (Asian) are Romanian (27.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Mongolian (27.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Subsaharan African (27.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Alaskan Athabascan (27.6%, a difference of 0.12%), and Immigrants from Bangladesh (27.6%, a difference of 0.12%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ugandans are Immigrants from China (27.4%, a difference of 0.010%), White/Caucasian (27.4%, a difference of 0.020%), British (27.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Argentina (27.5%, a difference of 0.070%), and Israeli (27.5%, a difference of 0.10%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households with Children |
Indians (Asian) | 71.6 /100 | #157 | Good 27.6% |
Romanians | 70.8 /100 | #158 | Good 27.6% |
Mongolians | 70.7 /100 | #159 | Good 27.6% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 67.5 /100 | #160 | Good 27.6% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 67.1 /100 | #161 | Good 27.6% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 67.0 /100 | #162 | Good 27.6% |
Czechs | 65.3 /100 | #163 | Good 27.5% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 64.9 /100 | #164 | Good 27.5% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 61.3 /100 | #165 | Good 27.5% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 61.2 /100 | #166 | Good 27.5% |
Dominicans | 61.1 /100 | #167 | Good 27.5% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 60.9 /100 | #168 | Good 27.5% |
Seminole | 56.9 /100 | #169 | Average 27.5% |
Cherokee | 56.7 /100 | #170 | Average 27.5% |
Blackfeet | 54.3 /100 | #171 | Average 27.5% |
Israelis | 53.9 /100 | #172 | Average 27.5% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 52.2 /100 | #173 | Average 27.5% |
Whites/Caucasians | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 27.4% |
British | 49.9 /100 | #175 | Average 27.4% |
Immigrants | China | 49.6 /100 | #176 | Average 27.4% |
Ugandans | 49.2 /100 | #177 | Average 27.4% |