Costa Rican vs Ottawa Currently Married
COMPARE
Costa Rican
Ottawa
Currently Married
Currently Married Comparison
Costa Ricans
Ottawa
46.5%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
43.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
180th/ 347
METRIC RANK
46.5%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
43.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
181st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Costa Rican vs Ottawa Currently Married Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,590,013 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.063 and weighted average of 46.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 49,956,726 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Ottawa and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.402 and weighted average of 46.5%, a difference of 0.020%.
Currently Married Correlation Summary
Measurement | Costa Rican | Ottawa |
Minimum | 18.8% | 34.6% |
Maximum | 70.1% | 81.4% |
Range | 51.3% | 46.8% |
Mean | 50.2% | 52.6% |
Median | 49.4% | 50.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 46.5% | 45.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 55.6% | 57.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.1% | 11.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.6% | 10.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.5% | 10.4% |
Demographics Similar to Costa Ricans and Ottawa by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Costa Ricans are Immigrants from Oceania (46.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Potawatomi (46.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Chickasaw (46.6%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (46.5%, a difference of 0.15%), and Brazilian (46.4%, a difference of 0.17%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ottawa are Potawatomi (46.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Oceania (46.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (46.5%, a difference of 0.13%), Brazilian (46.4%, a difference of 0.14%), and Chickasaw (46.6%, a difference of 0.18%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
Immigrants | Latvia | 56.7 /100 | #170 | Average 46.7% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 52.4 /100 | #171 | Average 46.7% |
Aleuts | 52.0 /100 | #172 | Average 46.7% |
Tlingit-Haida | 51.2 /100 | #173 | Average 46.7% |
Peruvians | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 46.6% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 49.9 /100 | #175 | Average 46.6% |
Hawaiians | 48.6 /100 | #176 | Average 46.6% |
Israelis | 48.6 /100 | #177 | Average 46.6% |
Chickasaw | 47.8 /100 | #178 | Average 46.6% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 44.6 /100 | #179 | Average 46.5% |
Costa Ricans | 43.7 /100 | #180 | Average 46.5% |
Ottawa | 43.0 /100 | #181 | Average 46.5% |
Potawatomi | 41.9 /100 | #182 | Average 46.5% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 39.7 /100 | #183 | Fair 46.5% |
Brazilians | 39.3 /100 | #184 | Fair 46.4% |
Mongolians | 37.6 /100 | #185 | Fair 46.4% |
Immigrants | Chile | 36.8 /100 | #186 | Fair 46.4% |
Immigrants | Peru | 35.3 /100 | #187 | Fair 46.4% |
Colombians | 31.8 /100 | #188 | Fair 46.3% |
Fijians | 30.3 /100 | #189 | Fair 46.3% |
Choctaw | 29.1 /100 | #190 | Fair 46.3% |