Costa Rican vs Chickasaw Births to Unmarried Women
COMPARE
Costa Rican
Chickasaw
Births to Unmarried Women
Births to Unmarried Women Comparison
Costa Ricans
Chickasaw
32.7%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
20.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
198th/ 347
METRIC RANK
36.3%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
255th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Costa Rican vs Chickasaw Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 243,618,809 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.314 and weighted average of 32.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 143,483,709 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.458 and weighted average of 36.3%, a difference of 11.0%.
Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Summary
Measurement | Costa Rican | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 4.8% | 5.6% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 95.2% | 94.4% |
Mean | 40.4% | 53.6% |
Median | 33.9% | 47.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 27.3% | 34.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 47.4% | 70.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 20.1% | 36.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 21.7% | 25.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 21.4% | 25.3% |
Similar Demographics by Births to Unmarried Women
Demographics Similar to Costa Ricans by Births to Unmarried Women
In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Costa Ricans are Immigrants (32.7%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Colombia (32.6%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Thailand (32.8%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Germany (32.8%, a difference of 0.22%), and Samoan (32.6%, a difference of 0.23%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Births to Unmarried Women |
Irish | 32.4 /100 | #191 | Fair 32.2% |
Colombians | 31.9 /100 | #192 | Fair 32.2% |
Fijians | 31.1 /100 | #193 | Fair 32.3% |
Sudanese | 27.3 /100 | #194 | Fair 32.4% |
Samoans | 21.9 /100 | #195 | Fair 32.6% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 21.7 /100 | #196 | Fair 32.6% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 20.6 /100 | #197 | Fair 32.7% |
Costa Ricans | 20.3 /100 | #198 | Fair 32.7% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 18.9 /100 | #199 | Poor 32.8% |
Immigrants | Germany | 18.8 /100 | #200 | Poor 32.8% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 16.7 /100 | #201 | Poor 32.9% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 16.6 /100 | #202 | Poor 32.9% |
Ute | 14.4 /100 | #203 | Poor 33.0% |
Immigrants | Africa | 14.3 /100 | #204 | Poor 33.0% |
German Russians | 13.1 /100 | #205 | Poor 33.1% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Births to Unmarried Women
In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (36.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Grenada (36.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Potawatomi (36.2%, a difference of 0.14%), American (36.4%, a difference of 0.31%), and Immigrants from Portugal (36.2%, a difference of 0.36%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Births to Unmarried Women |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 0.6 /100 | #248 | Tragic 35.5% |
Bermudans | 0.6 /100 | #249 | Tragic 35.5% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.4 /100 | #250 | Tragic 35.7% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 36.0% |
Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 36.0% |
Immigrants | Portugal | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 36.2% |
Potawatomi | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 36.2% |
Chickasaw | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 36.3% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 36.3% |
Immigrants | Grenada | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 36.3% |
Americans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 36.4% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 36.4% |
Ottawa | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 36.5% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 36.5% |
French American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 36.6% |