Cape Verdean vs Immigrants from Romania Average Family Size
COMPARE
Cape Verdean
Immigrants from Romania
Average Family Size
Average Family Size Comparison
Cape Verdeans
Immigrants from Romania
3.17
AVERAGE FAMILY SIZE
1.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
255th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.18
AVERAGE FAMILY SIZE
3.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
237th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cape Verdean vs Immigrants from Romania Average Family Size Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 107,550,345 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Cape Verdeans and average family size in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.203 and weighted average of 3.17. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 256,963,542 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Romania and average family size in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.374 and weighted average of 3.18, a difference of 0.40%.
Average Family Size Correlation Summary
Measurement | Cape Verdean | Immigrants from Romania |
Minimum | 2.41 | 1.97 |
Maximum | 3.52 | 4.06 |
Range | 1.11 | 2.09 |
Mean | 3.03 | 3.00 |
Median | 3.08 | 3.07 |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.91 | 2.88 |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.18 | 3.19 |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.27 | 0.31 |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.24 | 0.32 |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.24 | 0.32 |
Demographics Similar to Cape Verdeans and Immigrants from Romania by Average Family Size
In terms of average family size, the demographic groups most similar to Cape Verdeans are Immigrants from Hungary (3.17, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (3.17, a difference of 0.020%), South African (3.17, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (3.17, a difference of 0.030%), and Immigrants from Spain (3.17, a difference of 0.050%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Romania are Romanian (3.18, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Portugal (3.18, a difference of 0.050%), Houma (3.18, a difference of 0.050%), Osage (3.18, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Japan (3.18, a difference of 0.10%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Average Family Size |
Immigrants | Portugal | 4.2 /100 | #236 | Tragic 3.18 |
Immigrants | Romania | 3.7 /100 | #237 | Tragic 3.18 |
Romanians | 3.7 /100 | #238 | Tragic 3.18 |
Houma | 3.4 /100 | #239 | Tragic 3.18 |
Osage | 3.2 /100 | #240 | Tragic 3.18 |
Immigrants | Japan | 3.0 /100 | #241 | Tragic 3.18 |
Hungarians | 3.0 /100 | #242 | Tragic 3.18 |
Immigrants | Moldova | 2.9 /100 | #243 | Tragic 3.18 |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 2.9 /100 | #244 | Tragic 3.18 |
Immigrants | Brazil | 2.7 /100 | #245 | Tragic 3.18 |
Danes | 2.5 /100 | #246 | Tragic 3.17 |
Cajuns | 2.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 3.17 |
Immigrants | Belarus | 2.3 /100 | #248 | Tragic 3.17 |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 2.1 /100 | #249 | Tragic 3.17 |
Puget Sound Salish | 1.9 /100 | #250 | Tragic 3.17 |
Immigrants | Spain | 1.8 /100 | #251 | Tragic 3.17 |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 1.7 /100 | #252 | Tragic 3.17 |
South Africans | 1.7 /100 | #253 | Tragic 3.17 |
Immigrants | Hungary | 1.7 /100 | #254 | Tragic 3.17 |
Cape Verdeans | 1.6 /100 | #255 | Tragic 3.17 |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 1.5 /100 | #256 | Tragic 3.17 |