Australian vs Slavic Family Households with Children
COMPARE
Australian
Slavic
Family Households with Children
Family Households with Children Comparison
Australians
Slavs
26.9%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
2.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
245th/ 347
METRIC RANK
26.8%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
1.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
257th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Australian vs Slavic Family Households with Children Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,944,645 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Australians and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.253 and weighted average of 26.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 270,744,912 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Slavs and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.081 and weighted average of 26.8%, a difference of 0.43%.

Family Households with Children Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Australian | Slavic |
| Minimum | 4.6% | 4.7% |
| Maximum | 48.8% | 47.1% |
| Range | 44.2% | 42.3% |
| Mean | 26.3% | 22.2% |
| Median | 26.4% | 23.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 20.8% | 15.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 32.4% | 27.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.6% | 11.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.1% | 8.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.0% | 8.3% |
Demographics Similar to Australians and Slavs by Family Households with Children
In terms of family households with children, the demographic groups most similar to Australians are Ukrainian (26.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (26.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Jamaican (26.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Navajo (26.9%, a difference of 0.090%), and Immigrants from England (26.9%, a difference of 0.090%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Slavs are Immigrants from Cuba (26.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Lithuania (26.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Scotch-Irish (26.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Jamaica (26.8%, a difference of 0.050%), and German Russian (26.8%, a difference of 0.060%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households with Children |
| Navajo | 3.2 /100 | #241 | Tragic 26.9% |
| Immigrants | England | 3.2 /100 | #242 | Tragic 26.9% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 2.9 /100 | #243 | Tragic 26.9% |
| Ukrainians | 2.9 /100 | #244 | Tragic 26.9% |
| Australians | 2.8 /100 | #245 | Tragic 26.9% |
| Jamaicans | 2.5 /100 | #246 | Tragic 26.9% |
| Potawatomi | 2.2 /100 | #247 | Tragic 26.9% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 2.2 /100 | #248 | Tragic 26.9% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 2.1 /100 | #249 | Tragic 26.9% |
| Belgians | 2.1 /100 | #250 | Tragic 26.9% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1.9 /100 | #251 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Irish | 1.8 /100 | #252 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Italians | 1.5 /100 | #253 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 1.5 /100 | #254 | Tragic 26.8% |
| German Russians | 1.5 /100 | #255 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Scotch-Irish | 1.4 /100 | #256 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Slavs | 1.3 /100 | #257 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 1.3 /100 | #258 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 1.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 1.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 1.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 26.8% |