Immigrants from Oceania vs Chickasaw No Schooling Completed
COMPARE
Immigrants from Oceania
Chickasaw
No Schooling Completed
No Schooling Completed Comparison
Immigrants from Oceania
Chickasaw
2.2%
NO SCHOOLING COMPLETED
10.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
209th/ 347
METRIC RANK
1.7%
NO SCHOOLING COMPLETED
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
69th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Oceania vs Chickasaw No Schooling Completed Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 302,492,399 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and percentage of population with no schooling in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.239 and weighted average of 2.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 146,942,262 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population with no schooling in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.104 and weighted average of 1.7%, a difference of 32.4%.
No Schooling Completed Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Oceania | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 0.28% | 0.11% |
Maximum | 6.2% | 4.2% |
Range | 5.9% | 4.1% |
Mean | 2.3% | 1.3% |
Median | 2.0% | 1.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.1% | 0.57% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.1% | 1.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.9% | 1.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.6% | 0.81% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.5% | 0.80% |
Similar Demographics by No Schooling Completed
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania by No Schooling Completed
In terms of no schooling completed, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Native/Alaskan (2.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Uruguayan (2.2%, a difference of 0.25%), South American Indian (2.2%, a difference of 0.26%), Bahamian (2.2%, a difference of 0.44%), and Immigrants from Bahamas (2.2%, a difference of 0.45%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Schooling Completed |
Moroccans | 13.7 /100 | #202 | Poor 2.2% |
Laotians | 13.3 /100 | #203 | Poor 2.2% |
Hopi | 12.9 /100 | #204 | Poor 2.2% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 11.6 /100 | #205 | Poor 2.2% |
Bahamians | 11.6 /100 | #206 | Poor 2.2% |
South American Indians | 11.0 /100 | #207 | Poor 2.2% |
Uruguayans | 11.0 /100 | #208 | Poor 2.2% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 10.2 /100 | #209 | Poor 2.2% |
Natives/Alaskans | 10.0 /100 | #210 | Tragic 2.2% |
Immigrants | Panama | 8.8 /100 | #211 | Tragic 2.3% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 8.7 /100 | #212 | Tragic 2.3% |
Ute | 8.2 /100 | #213 | Tragic 2.3% |
Samoans | 8.2 /100 | #214 | Tragic 2.3% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 7.2 /100 | #215 | Tragic 2.3% |
Tongans | 6.8 /100 | #216 | Tragic 2.3% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by No Schooling Completed
In terms of no schooling completed, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Lithuania (1.7%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Netherlands (1.7%, a difference of 0.97%), Immigrants from Austria (1.7%, a difference of 1.0%), Canadian (1.7%, a difference of 1.2%), and Immigrants from England (1.7%, a difference of 1.3%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Schooling Completed |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.8 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 1.7% |
Russians | 99.8 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 1.7% |
New Zealanders | 99.7 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 1.7% |
Serbians | 99.7 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 1.7% |
Canadians | 99.7 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 1.7% |
Immigrants | Austria | 99.7 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 1.7% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.7 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 1.7% |
Chickasaw | 99.6 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 1.7% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 99.6 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 1.7% |
Immigrants | England | 99.5 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 1.7% |
Cajuns | 99.5 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 1.7% |
Immigrants | India | 99.4 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 1.7% |
Zimbabweans | 99.4 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 1.7% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 99.3 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 1.7% |
Cherokee | 99.3 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 1.7% |