Yup'ik vs Kiowa Disability Age 35 to 64
COMPARE
Yup'ik
Kiowa
Disability Age 35 to 64
Disability Age 35 to 64 Comparison
Yup'ik
Kiowa
16.9%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
344th/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.4%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
345th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Yup'ik vs Kiowa Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 39,958,174 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Yup'ik and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.347 and weighted average of 16.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 56,099,000 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Kiowa and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.174 and weighted average of 17.4%, a difference of 2.5%.
Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Yup'ik | Kiowa |
Minimum | 3.2% | 8.3% |
Maximum | 44.4% | 46.2% |
Range | 41.2% | 37.8% |
Mean | 18.9% | 21.6% |
Median | 18.2% | 22.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.2% | 16.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.9% | 26.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.6% | 10.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.1% | 7.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.1% | 7.7% |
Demographics Similar to Yup'ik and Kiowa by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Yup'ik are Creek (16.9%, a difference of 0.32%), Tohono O'odham (16.7%, a difference of 1.2%), Tsimshian (16.7%, a difference of 1.3%), Choctaw (16.4%, a difference of 3.2%), and Lumbee (17.6%, a difference of 4.2%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Kiowa are Lumbee (17.6%, a difference of 1.7%), Creek (16.9%, a difference of 2.8%), Tohono O'odham (16.7%, a difference of 3.7%), Tsimshian (16.7%, a difference of 3.8%), and Choctaw (16.4%, a difference of 5.8%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 15.3% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 15.5% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 15.5% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 15.6% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 15.7% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 15.8% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 15.8% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 15.9% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 15.9% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 15.9% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 16.1% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 16.1% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 16.4% |
Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 16.7% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 16.7% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 16.9% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 16.9% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 17.4% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 17.6% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 18.7% |