Yuman vs Choctaw Disability Age 35 to 64
COMPARE
Yuman
Choctaw
Disability Age 35 to 64
Disability Age 35 to 64 Comparison
Yuman
Choctaw
15.8%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
333rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.4%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
340th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Yuman vs Choctaw Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 40,663,205 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Yuman and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.056 and weighted average of 15.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 269,605,356 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.246 and weighted average of 16.4%, a difference of 3.8%.

Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Yuman | Choctaw |
| Minimum | 3.9% | 2.2% |
| Maximum | 48.4% | 50.0% |
| Range | 44.5% | 47.8% |
| Mean | 20.2% | 26.3% |
| Median | 18.2% | 25.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.2% | 21.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 31.5% | 30.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 22.3% | 9.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.1% | 7.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.8% | 7.4% |
Demographics Similar to Yuman and Choctaw by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Yuman are Colville (15.8%, a difference of 0.19%), Seminole (15.9%, a difference of 0.30%), Menominee (15.9%, a difference of 0.53%), Alaskan Athabascan (15.7%, a difference of 0.55%), and Puerto Rican (15.9%, a difference of 0.85%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Choctaw are Pima (16.1%, a difference of 1.7%), Chickasaw (16.1%, a difference of 1.9%), Tsimshian (16.7%, a difference of 1.9%), Tohono O'odham (16.7%, a difference of 2.0%), and Creek (16.9%, a difference of 2.9%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 15.5% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 15.5% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 17.4% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 17.6% |