Yakama vs Immigrants from Grenada Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Yakama
Immigrants from Grenada
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Yakama
Immigrants from Grenada
6.8%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
286th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
298th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Yakama vs Immigrants from Grenada Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 19,917,759 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Yakama and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.046 and weighted average of 6.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 67,197,356 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Grenada and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.065 and weighted average of 6.9%, a difference of 1.8%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Yakama | Immigrants from Grenada |
Minimum | 4.2% | 1.1% |
Maximum | 16.3% | 11.0% |
Range | 12.0% | 9.9% |
Mean | 8.5% | 6.4% |
Median | 7.3% | 6.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.5% | 5.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.5% | 7.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.0% | 2.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.9% | 2.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.9% | 2.0% |
Demographics Similar to Yakama and Immigrants from Grenada by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Yakama are Fijian (6.8%, a difference of 0.040%), U.S. Virgin Islander (6.8%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from Jamaica (6.8%, a difference of 0.45%), Immigrants from Barbados (6.8%, a difference of 0.52%), and Nonimmigrants (6.9%, a difference of 0.60%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Grenada are French American Indian (6.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Puget Sound Salish (6.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Marshallese (6.9%, a difference of 0.14%), Alaskan Athabascan (6.9%, a difference of 0.18%), and British West Indian (7.0%, a difference of 0.37%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 6.8% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 6.8% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 6.8% |
Fijians | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 6.8% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 6.8% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 6.8% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 6.9% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 6.9% |
Scotch-Irish | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 6.9% |
West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 6.9% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 6.9% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 6.9% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 6.9% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 6.9% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 6.9% |
French American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 6.9% |
Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 6.9% |
Puget Sound Salish | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 6.9% |
Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 6.9% |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 7.0% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 7.0% |