Uruguayan vs Laotian Disability Age 18 to 34
COMPARE
Uruguayan
Laotian
Disability Age 18 to 34
Disability Age 18 to 34 Comparison
Uruguayans
Laotians
6.2%
DISABILITY AGE 18 TO 34
97.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
97th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.2%
DISABILITY AGE 18 TO 34
96.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
102nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Uruguayan vs Laotian Disability Age 18 to 34 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,733,495 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Uruguayans and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 18 and 35 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.137 and weighted average of 6.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,649,729 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Laotians and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 18 and 35 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.536 and weighted average of 6.2%, a difference of 0.55%.
Disability Age 18 to 34 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Uruguayan | Laotian |
Minimum | 3.0% | 2.7% |
Maximum | 22.1% | 24.8% |
Range | 19.0% | 22.1% |
Mean | 9.3% | 9.2% |
Median | 7.0% | 6.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.8% | 5.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.0% | 10.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.2% | 4.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.3% | 5.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.2% | 5.7% |
Demographics Similar to Uruguayans and Laotians by Disability Age 18 to 34
In terms of disability age 18 to 34, the demographic groups most similar to Uruguayans are Immigrants from Syria (6.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Uruguay (6.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Central American (6.2%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (6.2%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants (6.2%, a difference of 0.21%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Laotians are Immigrants from Bulgaria (6.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Jamaica (6.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Mongolian (6.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Bhutanese (6.2%, a difference of 0.090%), and Immigrants from Albania (6.2%, a difference of 0.18%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 18 to 34 |
Turks | 97.8 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 6.2% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 97.7 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 6.2% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 97.6 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 6.2% |
Jordanians | 97.6 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 6.2% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 97.6 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 6.2% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 97.5 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 6.2% |
Central Americans | 97.5 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 6.2% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 97.4 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 6.2% |
Uruguayans | 97.3 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 6.2% |
Immigrants | Syria | 97.2 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 6.2% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 96.9 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 6.2% |
Immigrants | Albania | 96.7 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 6.2% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 96.4 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 6.2% |
Laotians | 96.4 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 6.2% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 96.3 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 6.2% |
Mongolians | 96.2 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 6.2% |
Bhutanese | 96.2 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 6.2% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 95.9 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 6.2% |
Ethiopians | 95.8 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 6.2% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 95.7 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 6.2% |
Sri Lankans | 95.5 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 6.2% |