Tsimshian vs Puerto Rican Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Tsimshian
Puerto Rican
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Tsimshian
Puerto Ricans
8.8%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
344th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
345th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Tsimshian vs Puerto Rican Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,626,544 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.395 and weighted average of 8.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 527,889,782 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Puerto Ricans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.672 and weighted average of 8.9%, a difference of 0.59%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Tsimshian | Puerto Rican |
Minimum | 4.1% | 4.0% |
Maximum | 25.7% | 24.3% |
Range | 21.5% | 20.2% |
Mean | 10.2% | 9.7% |
Median | 8.6% | 8.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.5% | 7.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.1% | 11.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.6% | 4.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.4% | 3.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.2% | 3.6% |
Demographics Similar to Tsimshian and Puerto Ricans by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Tsimshian are Tohono O'odham (8.7%, a difference of 0.97%), Kiowa (8.6%, a difference of 2.5%), Creek (8.5%, a difference of 4.4%), Houma (9.3%, a difference of 5.5%), and Choctaw (8.3%, a difference of 6.1%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Puerto Ricans are Tohono O'odham (8.7%, a difference of 1.6%), Kiowa (8.6%, a difference of 3.1%), Houma (9.3%, a difference of 4.9%), Creek (8.5%, a difference of 5.0%), and Choctaw (8.3%, a difference of 6.7%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 7.6% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 7.6% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 7.7% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 7.8% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 7.8% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 7.9% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 7.9% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 8.0% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 8.0% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 8.2% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 8.2% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 8.2% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 8.3% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 8.5% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 8.6% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 8.7% |
Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 8.8% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 8.9% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 9.3% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 9.5% |