Sri Lankan vs Latvian Disability Age 35 to 64
COMPARE
Sri Lankan
Latvian
Disability Age 35 to 64
Disability Age 35 to 64 Comparison
Sri Lankans
Latvians
10.2%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
84th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.2%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
81st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Sri Lankan vs Latvian Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 440,040,634 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Sri Lankans and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.282 and weighted average of 10.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 220,634,735 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.106 and weighted average of 10.2%, a difference of 0.13%.
Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Sri Lankan | Latvian |
Minimum | 1.2% | 1.5% |
Maximum | 50.9% | 33.4% |
Range | 49.7% | 31.8% |
Mean | 11.8% | 11.2% |
Median | 9.3% | 10.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.0% | 8.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.8% | 12.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.7% | 4.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.7% | 5.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.7% | 5.3% |
Demographics Similar to Sri Lankans and Latvians by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Sri Lankans are Immigrants from Brazil (10.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Russian (10.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Kuwait (10.2%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Croatia (10.2%, a difference of 0.23%), and Immigrants from Europe (10.2%, a difference of 0.29%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Latvians are Russian (10.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Brazil (10.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Croatia (10.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Vietnam (10.1%, a difference of 0.23%), and Jordanian (10.1%, a difference of 0.30%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.5 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Immigrants | France | 99.5 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Laotians | 99.4 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 99.4 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Immigrants | Chile | 99.4 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Mongolians | 99.4 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Jordanians | 99.3 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 99.3 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 99.3 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Latvians | 99.2 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Russians | 99.2 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 99.2 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Sri Lankans | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 99.1 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Immigrants | Europe | 99.1 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Nicaraguans | 99.1 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Chileans | 99.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Uruguayans | 99.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Afghans | 98.9 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 98.9 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 98.7 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 10.3% |