Somali vs Kenyan Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Somali
Kenyan
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Somalis
Kenyans
5.7%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
78th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.8%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
98.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
94th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Somali vs Kenyan Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 99,294,852 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Somalis and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.681 and weighted average of 5.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 168,175,436 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Kenyans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.464 and weighted average of 5.8%, a difference of 1.0%.
![Somali vs Kenyan Ambulatory Disability](/correlation-charts/metric-comparison/ambulatory-disability/somalis-vs-kenyans-ambulatory-disability-chart.webp)
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Somali | Kenyan |
Minimum | 3.3% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 13.6% | 13.2% |
Range | 10.2% | 11.9% |
Mean | 6.0% | 6.2% |
Median | 5.7% | 5.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.9% | 5.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.6% | 6.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.7% | 1.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.8% | 2.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.8% | 2.3% |
Demographics Similar to Somalis and Kenyans by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Somalis are Immigrants from Vietnam (5.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Chilean (5.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Ireland (5.7%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Jordan (5.7%, a difference of 0.14%), and Palestinian (5.7%, a difference of 0.15%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Kenyans are Immigrants from El Salvador (5.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Salvadoran (5.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Denmark (5.8%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Sierra Leone (5.8%, a difference of 0.20%), and Bhutanese (5.8%, a difference of 0.37%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Sudanese | 99.3 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 99.3 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Somalis | 99.2 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Chileans | 99.2 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.2 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 99.2 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Palestinians | 99.2 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.2 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Ugandans | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 5.7% |
South Americans | 99.0 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Latvians | 99.0 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Chile | 98.9 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Soviet Union | 98.9 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Bhutanese | 98.8 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Australians | 98.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 98.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 98.6 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 98.6 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Kenyans | 98.4 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 98.4 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Salvadorans | 98.4 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 5.8% |