Slavic vs Houma Disability Age 35 to 64
COMPARE
Slavic
Houma
Disability Age 35 to 64
Disability Age 35 to 64 Comparison
Slavs
Houma
11.7%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
15.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
205th/ 347
METRIC RANK
18.7%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
347th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Slavic vs Houma Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 270,786,875 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Slavs and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.653 and weighted average of 11.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 36,789,508 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Houma and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.824 and weighted average of 18.7%, a difference of 60.4%.
Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Slavic | Houma |
Minimum | 2.3% | 10.2% |
Maximum | 90.1% | 57.5% |
Range | 87.9% | 47.3% |
Mean | 16.7% | 21.7% |
Median | 12.0% | 17.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.5% | 15.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.5% | 22.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.0% | 6.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.9% | 12.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.8% | 12.3% |
Similar Demographics by Disability Age 35 to 64
Demographics Similar to Slavs by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Slavs are Native Hawaiian (11.7%, a difference of 0.10%), Ghanaian (11.7%, a difference of 0.10%), Nigerian (11.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Guatemalan (11.7%, a difference of 0.13%), and British (11.6%, a difference of 0.22%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
Immigrants | Panama | 20.4 /100 | #198 | Fair 11.6% |
Basques | 19.5 /100 | #199 | Poor 11.6% |
Swiss | 18.7 /100 | #200 | Poor 11.6% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 17.7 /100 | #201 | Poor 11.6% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 17.5 /100 | #202 | Poor 11.6% |
British | 17.0 /100 | #203 | Poor 11.6% |
Nigerians | 16.3 /100 | #204 | Poor 11.6% |
Slavs | 15.5 /100 | #205 | Poor 11.7% |
Native Hawaiians | 14.8 /100 | #206 | Poor 11.7% |
Ghanaians | 14.8 /100 | #207 | Poor 11.7% |
Guatemalans | 14.6 /100 | #208 | Poor 11.7% |
Europeans | 13.5 /100 | #209 | Poor 11.7% |
Belgians | 13.1 /100 | #210 | Poor 11.7% |
Canadians | 13.0 /100 | #211 | Poor 11.7% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 11.8 /100 | #212 | Poor 11.7% |
Demographics Similar to Houma by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Houma are Lumbee (17.6%, a difference of 5.9%), Kiowa (17.4%, a difference of 7.7%), Yup'ik (16.9%, a difference of 10.3%), Creek (16.9%, a difference of 10.7%), and Tohono O'odham (16.7%, a difference of 11.6%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 15.8% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 15.8% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 15.9% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 15.9% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 15.9% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 16.1% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 16.1% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 16.4% |
Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 16.7% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 16.7% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 16.9% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 16.9% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 17.4% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 17.6% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 18.7% |