Scotch-Irish vs Cape Verdean Vision Disability
COMPARE
Scotch-Irish
Cape Verdean
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Scotch-Irish
Cape Verdeans
2.4%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
276th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.4%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
280th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Scotch-Irish vs Cape Verdean Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 547,366,805 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Scotch-Irish and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.359 and weighted average of 2.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 107,539,896 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Cape Verdeans and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.111 and weighted average of 2.4%, a difference of 0.25%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Scotch-Irish | Cape Verdean |
| Minimum | 0.89% | 0.56% |
| Maximum | 39.6% | 4.3% |
| Range | 38.7% | 3.7% |
| Mean | 6.0% | 2.3% |
| Median | 3.5% | 2.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.7% | 1.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.6% | 2.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.9% | 0.84% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.3% | 0.75% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.2% | 0.74% |
Demographics Similar to Scotch-Irish and Cape Verdeans by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Scotch-Irish are Bahamian (2.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Chippewa (2.4%, a difference of 0.090%), Spanish (2.4%, a difference of 0.20%), Nepalese (2.4%, a difference of 0.21%), and Immigrants from Latin America (2.4%, a difference of 0.41%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Cape Verdeans are Nepalese (2.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Spanish (2.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Bahamian (2.4%, a difference of 0.21%), U.S. Virgin Islander (2.5%, a difference of 0.23%), and Chippewa (2.4%, a difference of 0.34%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Senegalese | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Celtics | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Cubans | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Spaniards | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Scotch-Irish | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Spanish | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Nepalese | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 2.4% |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 2.5% |
| Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 2.5% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 2.5% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 2.5% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 2.5% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 2.5% |
| Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 2.5% |
| French American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 2.5% |