Russian vs Immigrants from Europe Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Russian
Immigrants from Europe
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Russians
Immigrants from Europe
5.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
93.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
118th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
87.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
132nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Russian vs Immigrants from Europe Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 511,917,360 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Russians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.631 and weighted average of 5.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 547,017,856 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Europe and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.817 and weighted average of 6.0%, a difference of 0.94%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Russian | Immigrants from Europe |
| Minimum | 1.0% | 0.74% |
| Maximum | 75.4% | 88.9% |
| Range | 74.4% | 88.1% |
| Mean | 9.5% | 12.3% |
| Median | 5.8% | 6.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.2% | 5.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.5% | 8.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.3% | 2.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.9% | 17.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.9% | 17.3% |
Demographics Similar to Russians and Immigrants from Europe by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Russians are Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (5.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Norwegian (5.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Estonian (5.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Costa Rican (5.9%, a difference of 0.18%), and Icelander (5.9%, a difference of 0.18%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Europe are Immigrants (6.0%, a difference of 0.11%), Ute (6.0%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (5.9%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (5.9%, a difference of 0.27%), and Immigrants from Italy (6.0%, a difference of 0.32%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| South American Indians | 94.8 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 94.7 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 93.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Russians | 93.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Norwegians | 93.1 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Estonians | 92.9 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Costa Ricans | 92.6 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Icelanders | 92.6 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 92.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 92.2 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Koreans | 91.6 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Arabs | 91.5 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 90.9 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 90.7 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 90.5 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 89.7 /100 | #130 | Excellent 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 89.5 /100 | #131 | Excellent 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 87.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 86.9 /100 | #133 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Ute | 86.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 85.0 /100 | #135 | Excellent 6.0% |